DSpace コレクション: 1969-071969-07http://hdl.handle.net/2433/1113212024-03-28T15:24:15Z2024-03-28T15:24:15Z工学者のみた人工腎臓(随想)吉田, 文武http://hdl.handle.net/2433/1200252021-09-15T09:27:20Z1969-07-01T00:00:00Zタイトル: 工学者のみた人工腎臓(随想)
著者: 吉田, 文武1969-07-01T00:00:00Z腎臓移植の研究 2.腎の保存に関する実験的研究:常圧および高圧酸素下低温灌流保存について進藤, 和彦http://hdl.handle.net/2433/1200242021-09-15T09:27:20Z1969-07-01T00:00:00Zタイトル: 腎臓移植の研究 2.腎の保存に関する実験的研究:常圧および高圧酸素下低温灌流保存について
著者: 進藤, 和彦
抄録: The renal preservation with hypothermic (4℃) perfusion under normobaric or hyperbaric oxygen (2 atmospheres) has been performed. The preservation times were 6 hours and 12 hours. In order to study function of the preserved canine kidney, the extracorporeal circulation method was used. The normobaric preserved kidneys were compared with the hyperbaric preserved kidneys in respect to the direct renal blood flow (DRBF), PAH or STS extraction ratio (E-PAH or E-STS), PAH or STS clearance (C-PAH or C-STS), C-STS/C-PAH, the total renal resistance (TRR) and the histological findings. The pattern of renal blood flow during perfusion was investigated adding three nerve blocking agents to the perfusate by renal microangiography. Results: 1) DRBF of the normobaric preserved kidney was more than that of the hyperbaric preserved one. 2) E-P AH and E-STS of the hyperbaric preserved kidney were higher than that of the normobaric preserved one, however C-PAH and C-STS of the latter were higher than those of the former. 3) The tubular function decreased eminently compared with the glomerular function. 4) TRR of the normobaric preserved kidney was lower than that of the hyperbaric preserved one. 5) On histological findings, no difference between the normobaric and hyperbaric preserved kidney was observed at 6 hours, but the former had more severe damage compared with the latter at 12 hours. 6) Procaine was most effective to prevent the spasm of renal vessels during perfusion.1969-07-01T00:00:00Z全尿路アレルギーの1例井上, 彦八郎三瀬, 徹宮川, 光生佐藤, 義基http://hdl.handle.net/2433/1200232021-09-15T09:27:20Z1969-07-01T00:00:00Zタイトル: 全尿路アレルギーの1例
著者: 井上, 彦八郎; 三瀬, 徹; 宮川, 光生; 佐藤, 義基
抄録: A 20-year-old man had a sudden attack of fever and general malaise, and was treated as cold. He then developed flank pain on the right side and gross hematuria associated with frequent urination, burning and dysuria. His past history showed urticaria of several occasions. He was admitted to the urological ward. Laboratory examinations showed blood sedimentation rate 14 mm in average, no anemia, no abnormalities in blood coagulation, normal value of total serum protein and its fractions, normal liver and renal functions. Immunological tests of the serum were also normal. Urological examinations revealed the palpable and tender kidney on the right side and the bladder region sensitive on pressure. The external urethral meatus was reddened and swollen with mucous discharge. Urinalysis showed hematopyuria and presence of small amount of bacteria. Cystoscopy revealed bladder capacity 150cc, marked bullous edema of the entire mucosa and hematuria from the both ureteral orifices. Excretory pyelography showed no stone, delay of dye excretion from the right kidney, and notching in the right pyeloureterogram and left ureterogram. Cystogram also showed scalloping. From the above findings, it was thought that the patient had edematous change of the entire urinary tract mucosa due to allergic reaction. He was then placed on the anti-allergic, hemostatic and antibiotic. The symptoms disappeared in three weeks and the urogram returned normal. Discussions were made on pathogenesis of this case especially on its allergic nature. Emphasis was made on the facts that the change involved the entire urinary tract and the urogram was very interesting. Some literature was reviewed on these points.1969-07-01T00:00:00Z射精管異常拡張症の1例田中, 広見藤本, 洋治森, 浩一島崎, 俊一郎http://hdl.handle.net/2433/1200222021-09-15T09:27:20Z1969-07-01T00:00:00Zタイトル: 射精管異常拡張症の1例
著者: 田中, 広見; 藤本, 洋治; 森, 浩一; 島崎, 俊一郎
抄録: A 44-year-old man was seen with the chief complaints of bloody semen and sterility. Urological examinations disclosed an abnormal dilatation of the ejaculatory duct which was compatible with ejaculatory duct cyst. The entire cyst was surgically removed. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient has had no trouble in sex life.1969-07-01T00:00:00Z