Downloads: 177

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
journal.pone.0076381.pdf615.44 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Limitations of airway dimension measurement on images obtained using multi-detector row computed tomography.
Authors: Oguma, Tsuyoshi  kyouindb  KAKEN_id
Hirai, Toyohiro  kyouindb  KAKEN_id
Niimi, Akio
Matsumoto, Hisako  kyouindb  KAKEN_id
Muro, Shigeo  kyouindb  KAKEN_id
Shigematsu, Michio
Nishimura, Takashi
Kubo, Yoshiro
Mishima, Michiaki
Author's alias: 平井, 豊博
Issue Date: 8-Oct-2013
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Journal title: PloS one
Volume: 8
Issue: 10
Thesis number: e76381
Abstract: [Objectives](a) To assess the effects of computed tomography (CT) scanners, scanning conditions, airway size, and phantom composition on airway dimension measurement and (b) to investigate the limitations of accurate quantitative assessment of small airways using CT images. [Methods]An airway phantom, which was constructed using various types of material and with various tube sizes, was scanned using four CT scanner types under different conditions to calculate airway dimensions, luminal area (Ai), and the wall area percentage (WA%). To investigate the limitations of accurate airway dimension measurement, we then developed a second airway phantom with a thinner tube wall, and compared the clinical CT images of healthy subjects with the phantom images scanned using the same CT scanner. The study using clinical CT images was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA. [Results]Errors noted in airway dimension measurement were greater in the tube of small inner radius made of material with a high CT density and on images reconstructed by body algorithm (p<0.001), and there was some variation in error among CT scanners under different fields of view. Airway wall thickness had the maximum effect on the accuracy of measurements with all CT scanners under all scanning conditions, and the magnitude of errors for WA% and Ai varied depending on wall thickness when airways of <1.0-mm wall thickness were measured. [Conclusions]The parameters of airway dimensions measured were affected by airway size, reconstruction algorithm, composition of the airway phantom, and CT scanner types. In dimension measurement of small airways with wall thickness of <1.0 mm, the accuracy of measurement according to quantitative CT parameters can decrease as the walls become thinner.
Rights: © 2013 Oguma et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
DOI(Published Version): 10.1371/journal.pone.0076381
PubMed ID: 24116105
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Show full item record

Export to RefWorks

Export Format: 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.