|タイトル:||The Legitimacy of Certification Standards in Climate Change Governance|
|著者:||de la Plaza Esteban, Coraina|
Visseren-Hamakers, Ingrid J.
de Jong, Wil
|抄録:||This article explores the role of two private steering mechanisms, the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and the Climate, Community and Biodiversity Alliance (CCBA), in REDD+, the climate change mitigation policy that aims to avoid deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries. It does so by analyzing input and output legitimacy of the two certification standards at the global level, and at national and local levels in Peru. The findings show an increasing interest among REDD+ actors in using these standards, and a relatively large number of Peruvian REDD+ projects that are certified by the FSC or CCBA. The findings also suggest intrinsic linkages between input and output legitimacy of the FSC and CCBA within single governance levels and across different scales. The article also demonstrates the added value of studying the legitimacy of policy instruments, such as the FSC and CCBA, in a specific context such as REDD+. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment|
|著作権等:||© 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.|
This is the accepted version of the following article: [SD]SD1568; [author]de la Plaza Esteban, Coraina and Visseren-Hamakers, Ingrid J. and de Jong, Wil; [title]The Legitimacy of Certification Standards in Climate Change Governance; [journal] Sustainable Development; [issn]1099-1719; [url]http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.1568; [doi]10.1002/sd.1568; [pages]n/a--n/a; [keywords]CCBA, certification, FSC, governance, legitimacy, partnerships, Peru, REDD+ ;[year]2014 which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sd.1568/pdf.
This is not the published version. Please cite only the published version. この論文は出版社版でありません。引用の際には出版社版をご確認ご利用ください。