ダウンロード数: 180

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
transinf.E92.D.1620.pdf338.73 kBAdobe PDF見る/開く
完全メタデータレコード
DCフィールド言語
dc.contributor.authorMIYAZAKI, Shuichien
dc.contributor.authorMORIMOTO, Naoyukien
dc.contributor.authorOKABE, Yasuoen
dc.contributor.alternative宮崎, 修一ja
dc.contributor.alternative森本, 尚之ja
dc.contributor.alternative岡部, 寿男ja
dc.contributor.alternativeMiyazaki, Shuichien
dc.contributor.alternativeMorimoto, Naoyukien
dc.contributor.alternativeOkabe, Yasuoen
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-31T01:41:02Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-31T01:41:02Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-01-
dc.identifier.issn0916-8532-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2433/226939-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the online graph exploration problem is to visit all the nodes of a given graph and come back to the starting node with the minimum total traverse cost. However, unlike the classical Traveling Salesperson Problem, information of the graph is given online. When an online algorithm (called a searcher) visits a node ν, then it learns information on nodes and edges adjacent to ν. The searcher must decide which node to visit next depending on partial and incomplete information of the graph that it has gained in its searching process. The goodness of the algorithm is evaluated by the competitive analysis. If input graphs to be explored are restricted to trees, the depth-first search always returns an optimal tour. However, if graphs have cycles, the problem is non-trivial. In this paper we consider two simple cases. First, we treat the problem on simple cycles. Recently, Asahiro et al. proved that there is a 1.5-competitive online algorithm, while no online algorithm can be (1.25-ε)-competitive for any positive constant ε. In this paper, we give an optimal online algorithm for this problem; namely, we give a $frac{1+sqrt{3}}{2}(simeq1.366)$-competitive algorithm, and prove that there is no $(frac{1+sqrt{3}}{2}-epsilon)$-competitive algorithm for any positive constant ε. Furthermore, we consider the problem on unweighted graphs. We also give an optimal result; namely we give a 2-competitive algorithm and prove that there is no (2-ε)-competitive online algorithm for any positive constant ε.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherInstitute of Electronics, Information and Communications Engineers (IEICE)en
dc.publisher.alternative電子情報通信学会ja
dc.rights© 2009 The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineersen
dc.subjectthe graph exploration problemen
dc.subjectonline algorithmen
dc.subjectcompetitive analysisen
dc.titleThe Online Graph Exploration Problem on Restricted Graphsen
dc.typejournal article-
dc.type.niitypeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.jtitleIEICE Transactions on Information and Systemsen
dc.identifier.volumeE92-D-
dc.identifier.issue9-
dc.identifier.spage1620-
dc.identifier.epage1627-
dc.relation.doi10.1587/transinf.E92.D.1620-
dc.textversionpublisher-
dc.addressKyoto Universityen
dc.addressKyoto Universityen
dc.addressKyoto Universityen
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
出現コレクション:学術雑誌掲載論文等

アイテムの簡略レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。