ダウンロード数: 268

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
cga.12381.pdf226.99 kBAdobe PDF見る/開く
タイトル: Current status and legal/ethical problems in the research use of the tissues of aborted human fetuses in Japan
著者: Kawasaki, Hidenori  kyouindb  KAKEN_id  orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2584-183X (unconfirmed)
Yamada, Takahiro
Wada, Takahito  kyouindb  KAKEN_id
Kosugi, Shinji  kyouindb  KAKEN_id  orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6036-6491 (unconfirmed)
著者名の別形: 川崎, 秀徳
山田, 崇弘
和田, 敬仁
小杉, 眞司
キーワード: ELSI
fetal tissue
guideline
law
legal/ethical problem
発行日: Nov-2020
出版者: Wiley
誌名: Congenital anomalies
巻: 60
開始ページ: 166
終了ページ: 174
抄録: To date, there is no law regulating the research use of human aborted fetuses in Japan. The aim was to review the current status with historical background and legal/ethical problems limiting the research use of the tissues of aborted human fetuses. We reviewed literature via PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Japana Centra Revuo Medicina and CiNii, reports from various committees and research groups from Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW), and domestic books. Aborted human fetal tissues used for research purposes were first documented in the 1920s. The first guideline, the Peel Code was released in 1972. Since then, in Western countries, the research use of aborted fetuses has been less restricted compared with that of embryos, due to the following guidelines outlined by expert groups. Currently, aborted fetal tissues are commercially available for research purposes in the United States. In Japan, only four indications are presented in “a public statement permitting research use of deceased fetuses' and ‘neonates’ organs, etc.” (1987). In the 2000s, expert committees of the MHLW concluded that research use of human aborted fetuses should be discontinued, and that comprehensive rules and independent regulations should be implemented. This issue has not been discussed in the Japanese legislature since 2003. Establishment of laws and guidelines for this issue is insufficient not only in Japan but also in other countries. It is important to secure transparency for making laws and guidelines and in obtaining public understanding.
著作権等: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: ['Congenital anomalies', 60(6), 166-174], which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/cga.12381. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.
The full-text file will be made open to the public on 14 August 2021 in accordance with publisher's 'Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving'
この論文は出版社版でありません。引用の際には出版社版をご確認ご利用ください。
This is not the published version. Please cite only the published version.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2433/259190
DOI(出版社版): 10.1111/cga.12381
PubMed ID: 32572995
出現コレクション:学術雑誌掲載論文等

アイテムの詳細レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。