このアイテムのアクセス数: 288

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
s10147-021-02002-x.pdf941.22 kBAdobe PDF見る/開く
タイトル: Long-term safety of high-dose whole pelvic IMRT for high-risk localized prostate cancer through 10-year follow-up
著者: Aizawa, Rihito  kyouindb  KAKEN_id
Nakamura, Kiyonao
Norihisa, Yoshiki
Ogata, Takashi
Inoue, Takahiro
Yamasaki, Toshinari
Kobayashi, Takashi
Akamatsu, Shusuke
Ogawa, Osamu
Mizowaki, Takashi  KAKEN_id  orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8135-8746 (unconfirmed)
著者名の別形: 相澤, 理人
中村, 清直
則久, 佳毅
緖方, 隆司
井上, 貴博
山崎, 俊成
小林, 恭
赤松, 秀輔
小川, 修
溝脇, 尚志
キーワード: Prostate cancer
Unfavorable risk
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy
Whole pelvic radiation therapy
発行日: Nov-2021
出版者: Springer Nature
誌名: International Journal of Clinical Oncology
巻: 26
号: 11
開始ページ: 2113
終了ページ: 2122
抄録: [Background] The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of whole pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy with a simultaneous-integrated boost (WP-SIB-IMRT) for locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPCa). [Methods] All patients with cT3–4N0M0 prostate cancer treated with WP-SIB-IMRT between February 2006 and September 2009 at our institution were analyzed retrospectively. The prescribed dose was 78 Gy to the prostate and 58.5 Gy to the prophylactic pelvic lymph nodal area in 39 fractions delivered using the simultaneous-integrated boost technique. All patients received short-term neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy alone (median 8.3 months). Propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to evaluate the additional benefit of prophylactic whole pelvic radiation therapy (WPRT), using the cohort of 203 LAPCa patients treated with prostate-only IMRT (PO-IMRT). [Results] In total, 47 consecutive patients were analyzed. The median estimated risk of pelvic lymph node involvement was 57.5%. The median follow-up period was 10.5 years. The 10 year prostate cancer-specific survival and biochemical failure (BF) rates were 92.2 and 54.8%, respectively. The 10 year cumulative incidence rates of ≥ grade 2 late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities were 21.6 and 17.2%, respectively. From a total of 250 patients, PSM analysis identified 76 patients with similar characteristics, and no significant difference in BF rates was observed between WP-SIB-IMRT and PO-IMRT cohorts (p = 0.261). [Conclusions] WP-SIB-IMRT for LAPCa was safe over long-term observation, although no clear benefit of WPRT was observed among our small and highly selected cohort. Regarding the additional efficacy of WPRT, further investigations are needed.
著作権等: This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-021-02002-x
The full-text file will be made open to the public on 02 August 2022 in accordance with publisher's 'Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving'.
This is not the published version. Please cite only the published version. この論文は出版社版でありません。引用の際には出版社版をご確認ご利用ください。
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2433/269266
DOI(出版社版): 10.1007/s10147-021-02002-x
PubMed ID: 34338920
出現コレクション:学術雑誌掲載論文等

アイテムの詳細レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。