このアイテムのアクセス数: 311
このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル | 記述 | サイズ | フォーマット | |
---|---|---|---|---|
j.ejrad.2022.110294.pdf | 2.36 MB | Adobe PDF | 見る/開く |
タイトル: | Evaluation of moyamoya disease in CT angiography using ultra-high-resolution computed tomography: application of deep learning reconstruction |
著者: | Fukushima, Yasuhiro Fushimi, Yasutaka ![]() ![]() ![]() Funaki, Takeshi ![]() ![]() ![]() Sakata, Akihiko ![]() ![]() ![]() Hinoda, Takuya ![]() ![]() Nakajima, Satoshi ![]() ![]() ![]() Sakamoto, Ryo ![]() ![]() Yoshida, Kazumichi ![]() ![]() Miyamoto, Susumu Nakamoto, Yuji ![]() ![]() ![]() |
著者名の別形: | 福島, 康宏 伏見, 育崇 舟木, 健史 坂田, 昭彦 日野田, 卓也 中島, 諭 坂本, 亮 吉田, 和道 宮本, 享 中本, 裕士 |
キーワード: | Deep learning Image reconstruction Digital subtraction angiography X-ray computed tomography |
発行日: | Jun-2022 |
出版者: | Elsevier BV |
誌名: | European Journal of Radiology |
巻: | 151 |
論文番号: | 110294 |
抄録: | [Purpose] The aim of this study was to examine the evaluation of ultra-high-resolution computed tomography angiography (UHR CTA) images in moyamoya disease (MMD) reconstructed with hybrid iterative reconstruction (Hybrid-IR), model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), and deep learning reconstruction (DLR). [Methods] This retrospective study with institutional review board approval included patients with clinically suspected MMD who underwent UHR CTA between January 2018 and July 2020. CTA images were reconstructed with three reconstruction methods. Qualitative visualization was evaluated in comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Quantitative evaluation included assessment of edge sharpness, full width at half maximum (FWHM), vessel contrast, and tissue signal-to-noise ratio (SNR[tissue]). One-way analysis of variance was used to analyze differences. In addition, reconstruction time were assessed. [Results] Qualitative evaluation of CTA for 33 sides did not differ significantly between reconstruction methods. In quantitative evaluation for 54 patients, edge sharpness for right and left cortical segments of the middle cerebral artery was significantly higher for Hybrid-IR than for other reconstructions. No significant difference was seen between MBIR and DLR. Edge sharpness for STA-MCA bypass was significantly higher for Hybrid-IR than for MBIR, but no significant difference was seen between Hybrid-IR and DLR. FWHM for STA-MCA showed no significant difference between the three reconstruction methods. DLR displayed the highest SNR[tissue]. The time required for reconstruction was 40 s for Hybrid-IR, 2580 s for MBIR, and 180 s for DLR. [Conclusion] UHR CTA with DLR adequately visualized vessels in patients with MMD within a clinically feasible reconstruction time. |
著作権等: | © 2022. This manuscript version is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license. The full-text file will be made open to the public on 1 June 2023 in accordance with publisher's 'Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving'. This is not the published version. Please cite only the published version. この論文は出版社版でありません。引用の際には出版社版をご確認ご利用ください。 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2433/275960 |
DOI(出版社版): | 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110294 |
PubMed ID: | 35427840 |
出現コレクション: | 学術雑誌掲載論文等 |

このアイテムは次のライセンスが設定されています: クリエイティブ・コモンズ・ライセンス