このアイテムのアクセス数: 96

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
j.reth.2021.07.001.pdf1.36 MBAdobe PDF見る/開く
タイトル: Cultured epithelial autografts for the treatment of large-to-giant congenital melanocytic nevus in 31 patients
著者: Morimoto, Naoki  kyouindb  KAKEN_id  orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0712-3172 (unconfirmed)
Mitsui, Toshihito
Katayama, Yasuhiro  kyouindb  KAKEN_id  orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1218-9130 (unconfirmed)
Kakudo, Natsuko
Ogino, Shuichi
Tsuge, Itaru  kyouindb  KAKEN_id
Sakamoto, Michiharu  KAKEN_id  orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0024-6807 (unconfirmed)
Hihara, Masakatsu
Kusumoto, Kenji
著者名の別形: 森本, 尚樹
片山, 泰博
荻野, 秀一
津下, 到
坂本, 道治
キーワード: Giant congenital melanocytic nevus
Curettage
Cultured epithelial autograft
L∗a∗b∗ color space
発行日: Dec-2021
出版者: Elsevier BV
誌名: Regenerative Therapy
巻: 18
開始ページ: 217
終了ページ: 222
抄録: Introduction: Giant congenital melanocytic nevus (GCMN) is a large melanocytic nevus, and its full-thickness removal is usually difficult due to the lack of skin available for reconstruction. Curettage is an alternative approach in cases of GCMN to remove the superficial dermis above the cleavage plane with a curette in the neonatal period, and its major complications include repigmentation, retarded epithelization, and hypertrophic scar formation. In Japan, the JACE® cultured epidermal autograft (CEA) was approved and covered by public healthcare insurance for the treatment of congenital melanocytic nevus (CMN) that is difficult to treat with conventional methods in 2016. We have used CEA for wounds after curettage in the neonatal period or following ablation after the neonatal period in combination with laser therapies to reduce the above-mentioned complications. Methods: In this study, we summarized all consecutive CMN patients treated using CEA from December 2016 to April 2019 and evaluated the duration required for epithelialization, incidence of hypertrophic scar, and color change in the target nevus by comparing the L∗ values one year later between the Curettage group, the non-Curettage group with initial treatment or the subsequent group. Results: No significant differences were seen in the epithelization period or incidence of hypertrophic scars among the groups, but the color of the target nevus was improved significantly in the Curettage group (p < 0.01) and non-Curettage group with initial treatment (p < 0.01). Conclusions: In conclusion, CEA seems to accelerate epithelization after curettage or ablation of CMN, and this treatment could improve the color of CMN when applied initially.
著作権等: © 2021 The Japanese Society for Regenerative Medicine. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2433/277435
DOI(出版社版): 10.1016/j.reth.2021.07.001
PubMed ID: 34377751
出現コレクション:学術雑誌掲載論文等

アイテムの詳細レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このアイテムは次のライセンスが設定されています: クリエイティブ・コモンズ・ライセンス Creative Commons