このアイテムのアクセス数: 94

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
s41598-021-97607-7.pdf1.39 MBAdobe PDF見る/開く
タイトル: Temporal subtraction CT with nonrigid image registration improves detection of bone metastases by radiologists: results of a large-scale observer study
著者: Onoue, Koji
Yakami, Masahiro  kyouindb  KAKEN_id  orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8487-405X (unconfirmed)
Nishio, Mizuho
Sakamoto, Ryo  kyouindb  KAKEN_id
Aoyama, Gakuto
Nakagomi, Keita
Iizuka, Yoshio
Kubo, Takeshi
Emoto, Yutaka
Akasaka, Thai  KAKEN_id
Satoh, Kiyohide
Yamamoto, Hiroyuki
Isoda, Hiroyoshi  kyouindb  KAKEN_id
Togashi, Kaori
著者名の別形: 尾上, 宏治
八上, 全弘
西尾, 瑞穂
坂本, 亮
久保, 武
赤坂, 太
磯田, 裕義
富樫, かおり
キーワード: Cancer imaging
Imaging techniques
Software
発行日: 2021
出版者: Springer Nature
誌名: Scientific Reports
巻: 11
論文番号: 18422
抄録: To determine whether temporal subtraction (TS) CT obtained with non-rigid image registration improves detection of various bone metastases during serial clinical follow-up examinations by numerous radiologists. Six board-certified radiologists retrospectively scrutinized CT images for patients with history of malignancy sequentially. These radiologists selected 50 positive and 50 negative subjects with and without bone metastases, respectively. Furthermore, for each subject, they selected a pair of previous and current CT images satisfying predefined criteria by consensus. Previous images were non-rigidly transformed to match current images and subtracted from current images to automatically generate TS images. Subsequently, 18 radiologists independently interpreted the 100 CT image pairs to identify bone metastases, both without and with TS images, with each interpretation separated from the other by an interval of at least 30 days. Jackknife free-response receiver operating characteristics (JAFROC) analysis was conducted to assess observer performance. Compared with interpretation without TS images, interpretation with TS images was associated with a significantly higher mean figure of merit (0.710 vs. 0.658; JAFROC analysis, P = 0.0027). Mean sensitivity at lesion-based was significantly higher for interpretation with TS compared with that without TS (46.1% vs. 33.9%; P = 0.003). Mean false positive count per subject was also significantly higher for interpretation with TS than for that without TS (0.28 vs. 0.15; P < 0.001). At the subject-based, mean sensitivity was significantly higher for interpretation with TS images than that without TS images (73.2% vs. 65.4%; P = 0.003). There was no significant difference in mean specificity (0.93 vs. 0.95; P = 0.083). TS significantly improved overall performance in the detection of various bone metastases.
著作権等: © The Author(s) 2021
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2433/278144
DOI(出版社版): 10.1038/s41598-021-97607-7
PubMed ID: 34531429
出現コレクション:学術雑誌掲載論文等

アイテムの詳細レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このアイテムは次のライセンスが設定されています: クリエイティブ・コモンズ・ライセンス Creative Commons