このアイテムのアクセス数: 87

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
j.jacasi.2023.03.013.pdf960.15 kBAdobe PDF見る/開く
タイトル: Single-Session Versus Staged Multivessel Optimal IVUS-Guided PCI in Patients With CCS or NSTE-ACS
著者: Yamamoto, Ko
Shiomi, Hiroki  kyouindb  KAKEN_id
Morimoto, Takeshi
Miyazawa, Akiyoshi
Watanabe, Hiroki
Nakamura, Sunao
Suwa, Satoru
Domei, Takenori
Ono, Koh
Sakamoto, Hiroki
Shigetoshi, Masataka
Taniguchi, Ryoji
Okayama, Hideki
Toyota, Toshiaki
Yokomatsu, Takafumi
Muto, Masahiro
Kawaguchi, Ren
Kishi, Koichi
Hadase, Mitsuyoshi
Fujita, Tsutomu
Nishida, Yasunori
Nishino, Masami
Otake, Hiromasa
Natsuaki, Masahiro
Watanabe, Hirotoshi
Suematsu, Nobuhiro
Tanabe, Kengo
Abe, Mitsuru
Hibi, Kiyoshi
Kadota, Kazushige
Ando, Kenji
Kimura, Takeshi
著者名の別形: 山本, 航
塩見, 紘樹
尾野, 亘
木村, 剛
キーワード: drug-eluting stent(s)
intravascular ultrasound
percutaneous coronary intervention
発行日: Aug-2023
出版者: Elsevier BV
誌名: JACC: Asia
巻: 3
号: 4
開始ページ: 649
終了ページ: 661
抄録: [Background] There are no studies comparing single-session vs staged multivessel intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) or non–ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). [Objectives] The authors aimed to compare single-session vs staged multivessel IVUS-guided PCI in patients with CCS or NSTE-ACS. [Methods] The OPTIVUS-Complex PCI study multivessel cohort was a prospective multicenter single-arm trial enrolling 1, 021 patients with CCS or NSTE-ACS undergoing multivessel PCI including left anterior descending coronary artery using IVUS aiming to meet the prespecified OPTIVUS criteria for optimal stent expansion. We compared single-session vs staged multivessel PCI. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any coronary revascularization. [Results] There were 246 patients (24.1%) undergoing single-session multivessel PCI, and 775 patients (75.9%) undergoing staged multivessel PCI. There was a wide variation in the prevalence of single-session multivessel PCI across the participating centers. The staged multivessel PCI group more often had complex coronary anatomy such as 3-vessel disease, chronic total occlusion, and calcified lesions requiring an atherectomy device compared with the single-session multivessel PCI group. The rates of PCI success, procedural complications, and meeting OPTIVUS criteria were not different between groups. The cumulative 1-year incidence of the primary endpoint was not different between single-session and staged multivessel PCI groups (9.0% vs 10.8%, log-rank P = 0.42). After adjusting confounders, the effect of single-session multivessel PCI relative to staged multivessel PCI was not significant for the primary endpoint (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.58-1.55; P = 0.84). [Conclusions] Single-session and staged multivessel IVUS-guided PCI had similar 1-year outcomes.
著作権等: © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
THIS IS AN OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE UNDER THE CC BY-NC-ND LICENSE.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2433/286418
DOI(出版社版): 10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.03.013
PubMed ID: 37614540
出現コレクション:学術雑誌掲載論文等

アイテムの詳細レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このアイテムは次のライセンスが設定されています: クリエイティブ・コモンズ・ライセンス Creative Commons