Downloads: 40

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
JOR_80_2_209.pdf1.4 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author森部, 豐ja
dc.contributor.alternativeMORIBE, Yutakaen
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-01T02:30:40Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-01T02:30:40Z-
dc.date.issued2021-09-30-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2433/289619-
dc.description.abstractThe image of the Tang Dynasty indirectly governing non-Chinese tribes who had submitted to the Tang by making their leaders local governors, a position that became inherited, is based on the description in the Xin Tangshu. Yet, does this image really portray the form of control in general during the Tang dynasty? As a result of the increasing number of studies using epitaphs conducted in the 21st century, we need to re-examine the situation of the control of the non-Chinese tribes by the Tang government. Currently, there are more than 12, 500 Tang-dynasty epitaphs available for study. Among these, we can use at least 47 epitaphs that are related to Jimizhou 羈縻州. The study of the Tang Dynasty’s control of the non-Chinese tribes is facing great changes due to the use of these epitaphs. For example, we know that Zhechongfu 折衝府were established in the Jimizhou, and it has been pointed out that Han officials may have served there. Furthermore, Wang Yikang 王義康has also pointed out that Tang Dynasty sent bureaucrats from the central government to Jimizhou to participate in their governance. We are now at the stage of completely reexamining the traditional image of the Tang Dynasty’s control of the non-Chinese tribes and Jimizhou. However, at this stage, it is not yet possible to give a complete overview on the Tang Dynasty’s policy of control over the non-Chinese tribes and the Jimizhou. Therefore, this paper first surveys the history of the Jimizhou in Yingzhou and the state of the stone inscriptions concerning it. Next, it points out that Zhechongfu were established in the Jimizhou of the Qidan契丹and Mohe 靺鞨in Yingzhou and surmises their locations. It then points out that there were both Han and non-Han bureaucrats in the offices of the Jimizhou. It also clarifies that the Jimizhou in Yingzhou did not consist of a single ethnic group.en
dc.language.isojpn-
dc.publisher東洋史研究会ja
dc.publisher.alternativeTHE TOYOSHI-KENKYU-KAI : The Society of Oriental Researches, Kyoto Universityen
dc.rights許諾条件により本文は2024-10-01に公開ja
dc.subject羈縻支配ja
dc.subject羈縻州ja
dc.subject契丹ja
dc.subject折衝府ja
dc.subject営州ja
dc.subject.ndc220-
dc.title唐朝󠄁の羈縻政策に關する一考察 -- 唐前󠄁半󠄁期の營州都督府隸下「羈縻府州」を事例として--ja
dc.title.alternativeA Study of the Policy of Controlling Non-Chinese Tribes in Yingzhou 營州 during the First Half of the Tang Dynastyen
dc.typejournal article-
dc.type.niitypeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.ncidAN00170019-
dc.identifier.jtitle東洋史研究ja
dc.identifier.volume80-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage209-
dc.identifier.epage252-
dc.textversionpublisher-
dc.sortkey02-
dc.identifier.selfDOI10.14989/289619-
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
dcterms.alternative唐朝の羈縻政策に関する一考察 -- 唐前󠄁半󠄁期の営州都督府隷下「羈縻府州」を事例として--ja
datacite.date.available2024-10-01-
datacite.awardNumber20K01010-
datacite.awardNumber.urihttps://kaken.nii.ac.jp/ja/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-20K01010/-
dc.identifier.pissn0386-9059-
dc.identifier.jtitle-alternativeTHE TOYOSHI-KENKYU : The Journal of Oriental Researchesen
jpcoar.funderName日本学術振興会ja
jpcoar.awardTitle石刻史料を用いた唐朝の羈縻支配像の再検討ja
Appears in Collections:80巻2号

Show simple item record

Export to RefWorks


Export Format: 


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.