このアイテムのアクセス数: 47

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
s11604-024-01713-1.pdf2.15 MBAdobe PDF見る/開く
タイトル: Limited diagnostic performance of imaging evaluation for staging in gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma: a multi-center study
著者: Himoto, Yuki  kyouindb  KAKEN_id  orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8508-8221 (unconfirmed)
Kido, Aki
Yamanoi, Koji  kyouindb  KAKEN_id  orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1240-5422 (unconfirmed)
Kurata, Yasuhisa
Morita, Satoshi
Kikkawa, Nao
Fukui, Hideyuki
Ohya, Ayumi
Iraha, Yuko
Tsuboyama, Takahiro
Ito, Kimiteru
Fujinaga, Yasunari
Minamiguchi, Sachiko
Mandai, Masaki
Nakamoto, Yuji
著者名の別形: 樋本, 祐紀
木戸, 晶
山ノ井, 康二
倉田, 靖桐
森田, 智視
南口, 早智子
万代, 昌紀
中本, 裕士
キーワード: Gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma
Diagnostic performance
Preoperative imaging
Multi-center study
Staging
発行日: May-2025
出版者: Springer Nature
誌名: Japanese Journal of Radiology
巻: 43
号: 5
開始ページ: 810
終了ページ: 819
抄録: [Purpose]The purposes of the study are to assess the diagnostic performance of preoperative imaging for staging factors in gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (GEA) and to compare the performance for GEA with that of usual-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (UEA) among patients preoperatively deemed locally early stage (DLES) (< T2b without distant metastasis).[Materials and methods]For this multi-center retrospective study, 58 patients were enrolled. All had undergone MRI with or without CT and FDG PET-CT preoperatively and had been pathologically diagnosed with GEA at five institutions. Based on the medical charts and radiological reports, the diagnostic performances of preoperative imaging for the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging factors were assessed retrospectively. Next, the imaging performance was assessed in preoperatively DLES-GEA (n = 36) and DLES-UEA (n = 136, with the same inclusion criteria). The proportions of underestimation of GEA and UEA were compared using Fisher’s exact test.[Results]Imaging diagnostic performance for GEA was limited, especially for sensitivity: parametrial invasion, 0.49; vaginal invasion, 0.54; pelvic lymph node metastasis (PELNM), 0.48; para-aortic lymph node metastasis, 0.00; and peritoneal dissemination, 0.25. Among preoperatively DLES patients, the proportions of underestimation were significantly higher in GEA than in UEA; parametrial invasion, 35% vs. 5% (p < 0.01); vaginal invasion, 28% vs. 6% (p < 0.01); PELNM, 24% vs. 6% (p < 0.05); peritoneal dissemination, 6% vs. 0% (p < 0.05).[Conclusion]At present, preoperative imaging diagnostic performance for staging factors in GEA does not meet clinical expectations, especially for sensitivity. Among patients preoperatively DLES, the proportions of underestimation in GEA were significantly higher than in UEA. Future incorporation of approaches specifically emphasizing GEA is desirable to improve imaging performance.
著作権等: © The Author(s) 2024
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2433/291653
DOI(出版社版): 10.1007/s11604-024-01713-1
PubMed ID: 39625593
出現コレクション:学術雑誌掲載論文等

アイテムの詳細レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このアイテムは次のライセンスが設定されています: クリエイティブ・コモンズ・ライセンス Creative Commons