ダウンロード数: 329

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
42_279.pdf417.8 kBAdobe PDF見る/開く
タイトル: 前立腺特異抗原(PSA)キット間におけるFree及びComplex typeの免疫認識の違いに関する検討 : Delfia法,ケミルミACS-PSA法,Eiken法を対象として
その他のタイトル: Determination of free type and complex type prostate-specific antigen (PSA): differences in immunorecognition by Delfia PSA, ACS-PSA and Eiken PA kits
著者: 寿美, 周平  KAKEN_name
梅田, 宏  KAKEN_name
古賀, 文隆  KAKEN_name
矢野, 雅隆  KAKEN_name
今井, 利一  KAKEN_name
細谷, 吉克  KAKEN_name
本田, 幹彦  KAKEN_name
前田, 節夫  KAKEN_name
鈴木, 徹  KAKEN_name
吉田, 謙一郎  KAKEN_name
根岸, 壮治  KAKEN_name
著者名の別形: SUMI, Shuhei
UMEDA, Hiroshi
KOGA, Fumitaka
YANO, Masataka
IMAI, Toshikazu
HOSOYA, Yoshikatsu
HONDA, Mikihiko
MAEDA, Setsuo
SUZUKI, Toru
YOSHIDA, Ken-ichiro
NEGISHI, Takeharu
キーワード: Prostate-specific antigen
Free type PSA
Complex type PSA
Immunorecognition
PSA kit
発行日: Apr-1996
出版者: 泌尿器科紀要刊行会
誌名: 泌尿器科紀要
巻: 42
号: 4
開始ページ: 279
終了ページ: 284
抄録: PSAの免疫認識の点からモノクローナル抗体・モノクローナル抗体の組み合わせ, モノクローナル抗体・ポリクローナル抗体の組み合わせ, ポリクローナル抗体・ポリクローナル抗体の組み合わせとし, Delfia法, ACS法, Eiken法をこれらの代表的キットとして検討した.PSAの血中存在様式であるfree PSAとACT-PSAの免疫認識にキット間で大きな違いがあること, free PSAとACT-PSAの比率が僅か3症例であるが症例間で大きく異なることが示された.前立腺癌の診断及びモニター上血中PSAを, total PSA値のみならずfree PSAとACT-PSAの存在様式別にも表現しておくことが重要である可能性を示唆した
To study immunorecognition of free type and complex type prostate-specific antigen (PSA) by current commercial PSA assays, sera from 3 patients with stage D2 prostate cancer were separated by Sephacryl S-200 chromatography and determined by Delfia PSA, ACS-PSA and Eiken PA kits. Two antibodies used in the 3 kits are 2 monoclonal, 1 monoclonal and 1 polyclonal and 2 polyclonal antibodies, respectively. Following chromatography, two PSA peaks were obtained in all patients. One was about 100 kDa and the other about 30 kDa. The former was considered to be the complex type PSA (complex with alpha-1 antichymotrypsin) and the latter to be free type PSA. As to free type PSA, the ACS-PSA kit and Eiken PA kit quantitated PSA values approximately 5.1 and 2.5 times higher than the Delfia PSA kit. For complex type PSA, the quantity determined by ACS-PSA kit was approximately 1.3 times higher than that determined by the Delfia PSA kit, while the quantity determined by the Eiken PA kit was about one third of that determined by Delfia PSA kit. The ratio of complex type PSA to total PSA (free type PSA + complex type PSA) was 74.8 +/- 14.9% (mean +/- SD) when determined by Delfia PSA kit, 59.3 +/- 18.4% by ACS-PSA kit and 52.9 +/- 13.8% by Eiken PA kit. The range of this ratio determined by ACS-PSA kit was from 47.3% to 80.5% in the 3 patients. These findings suggest that there are qualitative differences in immunorecognition of free type PSA and complex type PSA among current commercial PSA assays and that there are quantitative differences in the ratio of the 2 forms of PSA in serum among prostatic cancer patients. The measurement and follow-up of both free type and complex type PSA might be important for diagnosis and monitoring of prostate cancer.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2433/115711
PubMed ID: 8693960
出現コレクション:Vol.42 No.4

アイテムの詳細レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。