ダウンロード数: 359

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
36_1213.pdf1.2 MBAdobe PDF見る/開く
タイトル: 前立腺肥大症に伴う排尿障害に対する塩酸ブナゾシンの臨床効果 - 二重盲検比較試験による検討 -
その他のタイトル: A double-blind trial on the effect of bunazosin hydrochloride for the symptoms of benign prostatic hypertrophy
著者: 熊本, 悦明  KAKEN_name
塚本, 泰司  KAKEN_name
八竹, 直  KAKEN_name
金子, 茂男  KAKEN_name
小柳, 知彦  KAKEN_name
富樫, 正樹  KAKEN_name
丸, 彰夫  KAKEN_name
土田, 正義  KAKEN_name
西沢, 理  KAKEN_name
折笠, 精一  KAKEN_name
棚橋, 善克  KAKEN_name
小柴, 健  KAKEN_name
石橋, 晃  KAKEN_name
横山, 英二  KAKEN_name
島崎, 淳  KAKEN_name
安田, 耕作  KAKEN_name
阿曽, 佳郎  KAKEN_name
東原, 英二  KAKEN_name
小川, 秋實  KAKEN_name
富田, 康敬  KAKEN_name
河邉, 香月  KAKEN_name
中野, 優  KAKEN_name
三宅, 弘治  KAKEN_name
近藤, 厚生  KAKEN_name
岡田, 謙一郎  KAKEN_name
秋野, 裕信  KAKEN_name
吉田, 修  KAKEN_name
西村, 一男  KAKEN_name
栗田, 孝  KAKEN_name
朴, 英哲  KAKEN_name
宮川, 征男  KAKEN_name
平川, 真治  KAKEN_name
熊澤, 津一  KAKEN_name
武井, 実根雄  KAKEN_name
著者名の別形: Kumamoto, Yoshiaki
Tsukamoto, Taiji
Yachiku, Sunao
Kaneko, Shigeo
Koyanagi, Tomohiko
Togashi, Masaki
Maru, Akio
Tsuchida, Seigi
Nishizawa, Osamu
Orikasa, Seiichi
Tanahashi, Yoshikatsu
Koshiba, Ken
Ishibashi, Akira
Yokoyama, Eiji
Shimazaki, Jun
Yasuda, Kosaku
Aso, Yoshio
Higashihara, Eiji
Ogawa, Akimi
Tomita, Yasutaka
Kawabe, Kazuki
Nakano, Yu
Miyake, Koji
Kondo, Atsuo
Okada, Kenichiro
Akino, Hironobu
Yoshida, Osamu
Nishimura, Kazuo
Kurita, Takashi
Park, Yonug-Chol
Miyagawa, Masao
Hirakawa, Shinji
Kumazawa, Joichi
Takei, Mineo
キーワード: Benign prostatic hypertrophy
Bunazosin hydrochloride
Double blind study
発行日: Oct-1990
出版者: 泌尿器科紀要刊行会
誌名: 泌尿器科紀要
巻: 36
号: 10
開始ページ: 1213
終了ページ: 1232
抄録: 前立腺肥大症に伴う排尿障害に対する塩ブナゾシンの臨床効果を, パラプロストおよびプラセボを対照薬とする多施設二重盲検比較試験により検討した.解析対象例は372例で塩酸ブナゾシン群129例, パラプロスト群118例, プラセボ群125例であった.層別解析の結果では, 前立腺所見, 自覚症状, 最大尿流量率, 残尿率において明瞭な所見を有する症例群では, 塩酸ブナゾシン群が有意に有用度においてパラプロスト群, プラセボ群より優る判定が得られた
A multicenter clinical trial was carried out on 372 patients in double-blind conditions in order to determine the clinical effects of Ea-0643 (bunazosin hydrochloride) on voiding disorders in benign prostatic hypertrophy, compared with paraprost and placebo. Of the 372 patients, 129 were assigned to bunazosin hydrochloride, 118 to paraprost and 125 to placebo. The improvement rating for all five subjective symptoms improved with passage of time in all the bunazosin hydrochloride, paraprost and placebo groups. A higher improvement rating was obtained in the bunazosin hydrochloride group for retarded urination, urinary stream condition and abdominal pressure at voiding, while the improvement rating was higher for prolonged urination in the placebo group and for residual urine in the paraprost group, but there was no significant difference in improvement ratings between the groups. The daily frequency of voiding decreased to a significant extent in the bunazosin hydrochloride and placebo group at week 1, and there was a significant difference between the bunazosin hydrochloride and the paraprost groups and between the placebo and the paraprost groups. The improvement rating for conditions of voiding was higher with the bunazosin hydrochloride group, when "slightly or better improved" cases were taken into account, but there was no difference between the groups. As for objective symptoms, maximum and average flow rate, useful measures for clinical evaluation of drug effects on voiding disorders, were significantly increased, with a decrease to match in residual urine ratio in the bunazosin hydrochloride group. In terms of maximum and average flow rate bunazosin hydrochloride was significantly superior to paraprost at weeks 1 and 2 and superior to placebo at weeks 2 and 4 and at the final evaluation as well. In terms of residual urine ratio bunazosin hydrochloride was superior to both paraprost and placebo. The global improvement rating, as assessed by the U- and chi 2-tests, was significantly higher in the bunazosin hydrochloride group than in the paraprost group, and there was a significant difference in global improvement ratings, as assessed by the chi 2-test, between the placebo and the paraprost groups, when "moderately or better improved" cases were taken into account. The stratified analysis of the prostate glands, subjective symptoms, maximum flow rate and residual urine ratio revealed that in patients with more advanced conditions the bunazosin hydrochloride group showed significantly superior improvement rates than the paraprost and placebo groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2433/117008
PubMed ID: 1702262
出現コレクション:Vol.36 No.10

アイテムの詳細レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。