ダウンロード数: 154
このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル | 記述 | サイズ | フォーマット | |
---|---|---|---|---|
25_0237.pdf | 396.5 kB | Adobe PDF | 見る/開く |
タイトル: | 転移のある腎細胞癌患者における腎摘除術の適否 |
その他のタイトル: | NEPHRECTOMY FOR RENAL CELL CARCINOMA WITH METASTASES |
著者: | 里見, 佳昭 高井, 修道 岡本, 重禮 福島, 修司 近藤, 猪一郎 吉邑, 貞夫 古畑, 哲彦 石塚, 栄一 |
著者名の別形: | Satomi, Yoshiaki Takai, Shudo Okamoto, Shigehiro Fukushima, Shuji Kondo, Inoichiro Yoshimura, Sadao Furuhata, Akihiko Ishizuka, Eiichi |
発行日: | Mar-1979 |
出版者: | 京都大学医学部泌尿器科学教室 |
誌名: | 泌尿器科紀要 |
巻: | 25 |
号: | 3 |
開始ページ: | 237 |
終了ページ: | 242 |
抄録: | Indications for nephrectomy in patients with renal carcinoma with metastasis are controversial and remain poorly defined. In an effort to define the role of nephrectomy more clearly, we have reviewed our experience with 62 patients. Of these patients of renal cell carcinoma with distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis, 32 underwent nephrectomy as a part of the over-all treatments, while the primary renal lesion was not removed in 30. One year survival rate of the patients undergoing nephrectomy was 37.5% (12 of32), compared to 32.1%(9 of 30) for the patients without nephrectomy. This difference is not statistically significant by chi square analysis. However, 4- of the patients undergoing nephrectomy lived more than 3 years, while all the patients without nephrectomy died within 25 months. Nephrectomy did not alter the survival rate of either group, but significant prolongation of survival was seen only in some patients undergoing nephrectomy which might perform cyto-reductive surgery. Therefore, we advocate that nephrectomy should be done in patients with metastatic renal carcinoma. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2433/122403 |
出現コレクション: | Vol.25 No.3 |
このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。