ダウンロード数: 727

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
27_0293.pdf502.82 kBAdobe PDF見る/開く
完全メタデータレコード
DCフィールド言語
dc.contributor.author松浦, 健ja
dc.contributor.author加藤, 良成ja
dc.contributor.author辻橋, 宏典ja
dc.contributor.author朴, 英哲ja
dc.contributor.author国方, 聖司ja
dc.contributor.author片岡, 喜代徳ja
dc.contributor.author永井, 信夫ja
dc.contributor.author金子, 茂男ja
dc.contributor.author郡, 健二郎ja
dc.contributor.author井口, 正典ja
dc.contributor.author秋山, 隆弘ja
dc.contributor.author八竹, 直ja
dc.contributor.author栗田, 孝ja
dc.contributor.alternativeMatsuura, Takeshien
dc.contributor.alternativeKato, Yoshinarien
dc.contributor.alternativeTsujihashi, Hironorien
dc.contributor.alternativeBoku, Eitetsuen
dc.contributor.alternativeKunikata, Seijien
dc.contributor.alternativeKataoka, Kiyonorien
dc.contributor.alternativeNagai, Nobuoen
dc.contributor.alternativeKaneko, Shigeoen
dc.contributor.alternativeKohri, Kenjiroen
dc.contributor.alternativeIguchi, Masanorien
dc.contributor.alternativeAkiyama, Takahiroen
dc.contributor.alternativeYachiku, Sunaoen
dc.contributor.alternativeKurita, Takashien
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-22T06:22:57Z-
dc.date.available2010-07-22T06:22:57Z-
dc.date.issued1981-03-
dc.identifier.issn0018-1994-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2433/122849-
dc.description.abstractWe have performed ileocecal conduit for urinary diversion to prevent stomal stenosis and ileoureteral reflux since 1975. Forty four cases of ileocecal conduit were studied and compared with thirty cases of ileal conduit. Postoperative pyelogram showed satisfactory result and the frequency of postoperative complication was about the same as that of ileal conduit. We experienced more cases of ileus as a late omplication especially in the cases those had postoperative irradiation. We concluded postoperative irradiation promoted the occurrence of ileus. Two patients of ileocecal conduit and one patient of ileal conduit developed renal stone. Though the genesis of urolithiasis is not clear, it is possible to prevent residual urine and ileoureteral reflux in the patients of ileocecal conduit in view of the results of pressure studies and conduitography. There is no difficulty in the operative procedure such as isolating ileocecal segment or anastmosis of the intestine. We consider ileocecal conduit as a satisfactory method for urinary diversion, but to date there are no reports about the long-term result of a large numbers of cases of ileocecal conduit. We think this procedure will be more adequately evaluated on accumulation of many cases.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isojpn-
dc.publisher京都大学医学部泌尿器科学教室ja
dc.publisher.alternativeDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto Univeersityen
dc.subject.ndc494.9-
dc.title回盲部導管による尿路変向術ja
dc.title.alternativeILEOCECAL CONDUIT FOR URINARY DIVERSIONen
dc.typedepartmental bulletin paper-
dc.type.niitypeDepartmental Bulletin Paper-
dc.identifier.ncidAN00208315-
dc.identifier.jtitle泌尿器科紀要ja
dc.identifier.volume27-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage293-
dc.identifier.epage299-
dc.textversionpublisher-
dc.sortkey08-
dc.address近畿大学医学部泌尿器科学教室ja
dc.address.alternativeThe Department of Urology, Kinki University School of Medicineen
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
dc.identifier.pissn0018-1994-
dc.identifier.jtitle-alternativeActa urologica Japonicala
dc.identifier.jtitle-alternativeHinyokika Kiyoen
出現コレクション:Vol.27 No.3

アイテムの簡略レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。