ダウンロード数: 1871

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
56_489.pdf618.85 kBAdobe PDF見る/開く
タイトル: 前立腺肥大症に対するナフトピジルとタムスロシンの臨床効果の比較
その他のタイトル: A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Clinical Effects of Naftopidil and Tamsulosin on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
著者: 羽入, 修吾  KAKEN_name
波田野, 彰彦  KAKEN_name
西山, 勉  KAKEN_name
小原, 健司  KAKEN_name
高橋, 公太  KAKEN_name
著者名の別形: Hanyu, Shugo
Hatano, Akihiko
Nishiyama, Tsutomu
Obara, Kenji
Takahashi, Kohta
キーワード: Benign prostatic hyperplasia
Naftopidil
Tamsulosin
発行日: Sep-2010
出版者: 泌尿器科紀要刊行会
誌名: 泌尿器科紀要
巻: 56
号: 9
開始ページ: 489
終了ページ: 494
抄録: A prospective randomized controlled study was performed to compare the clinical effects of naftopidil and tamsulosin. Men complaining of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia were randomized into two groups : one receiving 50mg naftopidil once daily (Naf group, n=36 patients), and the other receiving 0.2 mg tamsulosin once daily (Tam group, n=32 patients). In the Naf group at 12 weeks, 7 items of the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), storage and voiding symptoms, total IPSS, quality of life (QOL) index (QOLI) and Qmax were improved significantly. In the Tam group at 12 weeks, 6 items of IPSS except urgency, storage and voiding symptoms, total IPSS, QOLI and Qmax were improved significantly. Improvement of residual urine volume (PVR) was insignificant in both groups. In intergroup comparison between the Naf and the Tam groups, variations of 7 items of IPSS, storage and voiding symptoms, total IPSS, QOLI, Qmax and PVR at 4 and 12 weeks after treatment were not statistically significant. There was almost no difference in clinical efficacy between Naf and Tam.
著作権等: 許諾条件により本文は2011-10-01に公開
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2433/126851
PubMed ID: 20940522
出現コレクション:Vol.56 No.9

アイテムの詳細レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。