ダウンロード数: 437
このアイテムのファイル:
| ファイル | 記述 | サイズ | フォーマット | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56_559.pdf | 610.58 kB | Adobe PDF | 見る/開く |
| タイトル: | 前立腺全摘除術における周術期抗菌薬投与法の検討: 単回投与法と1日投与法との比較 |
| その他のタイトル: | Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Radical Prostatectomy : Single Dose Versus 1-Day Treatment |
| 著者: | 田岡, 利宜也  松岡, 崇志 北, 悠希 牧野, 雄樹 伊波, 恵 宗田, 武 井上, 幸治 武縄, 淳 寺井, 章人 |
| 著者名の別形: | Taoka, Rikiya Matsuoka, Takashi Kita, Yuki Makino, Yuki Iha, Kei Soda, Takeshi Inoue, Koji Takenawa, Jun Terai, Akito |
| キーワード: | Radical prostatectomy Perioperative infection Antimicrobial prophylaxis |
| 発行日: | Oct-2010 |
| 出版者: | 泌尿器科紀要刊行会 |
| 誌名: | 泌尿器科紀要 |
| 巻: | 56 |
| 号: | 10 |
| 開始ページ: | 559 |
| 終了ページ: | 563 |
| 抄録: | An adequate protocol for antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) in radical prostatectomy (RP) has not been established. We retrospectively compared the occurrence of perioperative infection following RP between two different AMP protocols. This study included 340 cases with prostate cancer who underwent RP at our institution between January 2005 and December 2008. The 1-day group consisting of 93 cases received a second generation cephem, cefotiam, intravenously during and after the operation on the operative day. The single dose group consisting of 247 cases received cefotiam during the operation only. The incidence of surgical site infection (SSI）and remote infection (RI) was retrospectively investigated. There was no significant difference in the rate of SSI and RI occurrence between the 1-day group (2.2, 0%) and single dose group (3.6, 0.4%) (p=0.52). The single dose protocol of AMP seems sufficient for prevention of perioperative infection in RP. |
| 著作権等: | 許諾条件により本文は2011-11-01に公開 |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2433/130818 |
| PubMed ID: | 21063159 |
| 出現コレクション: | Vol.56 No.10 |
このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。