このアイテムのアクセス数: 1642

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
59_277.pdf933.47 kBAdobe PDF見る/開く
完全メタデータレコード
DCフィールド言語
dc.contributor.author川村, 憲彦ja
dc.contributor.author松下, 慎ja
dc.contributor.author岡田, 宜之ja
dc.contributor.author氏家, 剛ja
dc.contributor.author任, 幹夫ja
dc.contributor.author辻畑, 正雄ja
dc.contributor.alternativeKawamura, Norihikoen
dc.contributor.alternativeMatsushita, Makotoen
dc.contributor.alternativeOkada, Takayukien
dc.contributor.alternativeUjike, Takeshien
dc.contributor.alternativeNin, Mikioen
dc.contributor.alternativeTsujihata, Masaoen
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-30T07:44:44Z-
dc.date.available2013-05-30T07:44:44Z-
dc.date.issued2013-05-
dc.identifier.issn0018-1994-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2433/174270-
dc.description.abstractSystemic cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens are the gold standard in advanced bladder cancer. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) therapy has often been used, although there is no significant evidence that it is better than methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, and cisplatin (MVAC) therapy in neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We retrospectively evaluated the relative efficacy of the two chemotherapeutic regimens in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer on patients who had had radical cystectomy for clinical stage T2-T4, N and, M0 bladder cancer. Fourteen patients (24.1%) and 44 (75.9%) patients were treated with GC and MVAC therapy, respectively. GC therapy was significantly more effective than MVAC therapy in pathological down-staging (to pT0) rate. On multivariate analysis, the choice of regimen (MVAC) was an independent predictor of the presence of residual cancer after a neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The clinical response to neoadjuvant GC therapy was superior to that to neoadjuvant MVAC therapy. Moreover, GC therapy was associated with less non-hematologic toxicity than MVAC therapy, especially with respect to the occurrence of nausea.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isojpn-
dc.publisher泌尿器科紀要刊行会ja
dc.rights許諾条件により本文は2014-06-01に公開ja
dc.subjectNeoadjuvantchemot herapyen
dc.subjectBladder canceren
dc.subject.ndc494.9-
dc.title浸潤性膀胱癌に対する術前抗癌化学療法としてのGC療法とMVAC療法の比較ja
dc.title.alternativeRelative Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Adriamycin, and Cisplatin in the Management for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Canceren
dc.typedepartmental bulletin paper-
dc.type.niitypeDepartmental Bulletin Paper-
dc.identifier.ncidAN00208315-
dc.identifier.jtitle泌尿器科紀要ja
dc.identifier.volume59-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.spage277-
dc.identifier.epage281-
dc.textversionpublisher-
dc.sortkey04-
dc.address大阪労災病院泌尿器科ja
dc.address大阪労災病院泌尿器科ja
dc.address大阪労災病院泌尿器科ja
dc.address大阪労災病院泌尿器科ja
dc.address大阪労災病院泌尿器科ja
dc.address大阪労災病院泌尿器科ja
dc.startdate.bitstreamsavailable2014-06-01-
dc.address.alternativeThe Department of Urology, Osaka Rosai Hospitalen
dc.address.alternativeThe Department of Urology, Osaka Rosai Hospitalen
dc.address.alternativeThe Department of Urology, Osaka Rosai Hospitalen
dc.address.alternativeThe Department of Urology, Osaka Rosai Hospitalen
dc.address.alternativeThe Department of Urology, Osaka Rosai Hospitalen
dc.address.alternativeThe Department of Urology, Osaka Rosai Hospitalen
dc.identifier.pmid23719134-
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
dc.identifier.pissn0018-1994-
dc.identifier.jtitle-alternativeActa urologica Japonicala
dc.identifier.jtitle-alternativeHinyokika Kiyoen
出現コレクション:Vol.59 No.5

アイテムの簡略レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。