Visual Judgment on Landscapes and Land-uses of Bogor Municipality

Abstract

本研究は, インドネシア・ボゴール市の市街地とその周辺部の景観と土地利用について, 住民に写真を見せて判定を依頼し, 視覚的選好を分析考察したものである。判定の対象は住宅地, 河川沿い, 商業地区, 緑地帯及び畑地などとした。これらの判定ではSD法を用いて分析すると共に, 対象景観の選好の順位つけ試験をもおこなった。その結果, 大枠において, 前回に行った地図を用いた景観と土地利用の選好試験と同様の結果を得た。すなわち, 自然発生的集落に比較して古い住宅地と新しい住宅地などが肯定的に判定された。また, 交通渋滞を伴う商業地や市場などが好まれなかった。ボゴール市当局の計画決定に際しては, 市民のこれらの選好を考慮に入れるべきであろう。

In this research, citizens of Bogor city were asked to judge some photographs of the city landscapes and land-uses. Those landscapes are an old settlement, a new settlement, an office area, a riverside with unplanned settlement, a riverside with abundant trees, a commercial area with traffic jam, a greenbelt area, a field crop area, and an unplanned settlement. Semantic differential ratings were used to measure respondents' perception of landscape in detail. In addition to that assessment, the respondents were asked to judge the best and the worst three of the landscapes. Generally, there is similarity in the results between this and previous research, especially in judging the landscapes and land-uses. The old and new settlements were affirmly rated by respondents in comparison with rating of unplanned settlement. They disliked the commercial area with traffic jam and the unplanned settlement. Public opinions on the landscapes and land-uses of Bogor city in this research became clear, and the results will be carried across to the Bogor City Planning Authorities. It would be a help for them to consider the citizens' perception and participation in their actions.