ダウンロード数: 5145

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
kjs_010_101.pdf921.12 kBAdobe PDF見る/開く
完全メタデータレコード
DCフィールド言語
dc.contributor.author菊地, 夏野ja
dc.contributor.alternativeKIKUCHI, Natsunoen
dc.contributor.transcriptionキクチ, ナツノja-Kana
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-24T06:02:13Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-24T06:02:13Z-
dc.date.issued2002-12-25-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2433/192628-
dc.description.abstractThis thesis deals with the "Paradox of Feminism". Feminism orginally tried to resist patriarchy and sexual oppression towards women. However in the course of the movement feminism fell into confusion, in some ways resulting in the preservation of such oppression. For example, many women have protested against pornography as violence against women. They have identified pornography as a product of patriarchy. However, in some cases political situations give resemblance to feminism and conservatism. Therefore confusion between feminism and that opponent occurs. Other issues including prostitution, domestic violence, and sexual harassment have the same composition. This paper analyses this paradox by considering the relationship between gender and sexuality. The two concepts each have their own history, but how the two relate has rarely been discussed. I think that the paradox of feminism is rooted in the relationship between gender and sexuality. Violence against women has two aspects, gender and sexuality. Trying to emphasis the concept of gender involves the problem of knowledge. As Foucault pointed out, sexuality is exclusive to knowledge. Consequently the discourse that opposes gender excludes some sexual elements in some respects. In contrast to this, to oppose the oppression of sexuality results in the ignorance of the violence against women and the problem of gender. This situation shows the relationship between gender and sexuality as one of dualism. In this dualism the discourse of the one causes the exclusion of the other. The discourse of feminism is placed in this dangerous logic. In this paper I try to make clear this dual logic and to Consider more viable alternatives for the feminist movement.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isojpn-
dc.publisher京都大学文学部社会学研究室ja
dc.publisher.alternativeDepartment of Sociology, Faculty of Letters, Kyoto Universityen
dc.subject.ndc361-
dc.title<論文>フェミニズムの逆説 : ジェンダーとセクシュアリティの関係ja
dc.title.alternative<ARTICLES>The Paradox of Feminism : The Relationship between Gender and Sexualityen
dc.typedepartmental bulletin paper-
dc.type.niitypeDepartmental Bulletin Paper-
dc.identifier.ncidAN10461313-
dc.identifier.jtitle京都社会学年報 : KJSja
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.identifier.spage101-
dc.identifier.epage118-
dc.textversionpublisher-
dc.sortkey07-
dc.address博士後期課程2年次・日本学術振興会特別研究員ja
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
dc.identifier.jtitle-alternativeKyoto Journal of Sociologyen
出現コレクション:第10号

アイテムの簡略レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。