このアイテムのアクセス数: 469

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
RLI.0000000000000159.pdf2.05 MBAdobe PDF見る/開く
完全メタデータレコード
DCフィールド言語
dc.contributor.authorHinoda, Takuyaen
dc.contributor.authorFushimi, Yasutakaen
dc.contributor.authorOkada, Tomohisaen
dc.contributor.authorFujimoto, Kojien
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Chunleien
dc.contributor.authorYamamoto, Akiraen
dc.contributor.authorOkada, Tsutomuen
dc.contributor.authorKido, Akien
dc.contributor.authorTogashi, Kaorien
dc.contributor.alternative日野田, 卓也ja
dc.contributor.alternative伏見, 育崇ja
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-28T02:42:42Z-
dc.date.available2015-04-28T02:42:42Z-
dc.date.issued2015-04-18-
dc.identifier.issn0020-9996-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2433/197533-
dc.description.abstract[Objectives]: The aim of this study was to assess the consistency and reproducibility of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) at 3-T and 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) scanners. [Materials and Methods]: This study was approved by institutional ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained. Twenty-two healthy volunteers underwent 2 examinations on different days. Each examination consisted of MR imaging on both 3-T and 1.5-T MR scanners. The data from both scanners and examination days were obtained, and QSM was calculated with STI Suite using 2 different algorithms-harmonic phase removal using laplacian operator (HARPERELLA) and a sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data (SHARP) method with a variable radius of the spherical kernel at the brain boundary (V-SHARP). We evaluated consistency of QSM between 3 T and 1.5 T and the reproducibility between the first and second examinations using 2-phase processing methods (HARPERELLA and V-SHARP). [Results]: Susceptibility values of regions of interests at 3 T were highly correlated with those at 1.5 T with good agreement (HARPERELLA, R2 = 0.838; V-SHARP, R2 = 0.898) (average difference, +/-1.96 SD; HARPERELLA, -0.012 +/- 0.046; V-SHARP, -0.002 +/- 0.034). Reproducibility analysis demonstrated excellent correlation between the first and second examination at both 3 T and 1.5 T for both algorithms (HARPERELLA at 3 T, R2 = 0.921; 1.5 T, R2 = 0.891; V-SHARP at 3 T, R2 = 0.937; 1.5 T, R2 = 0.926). Bland-Altman analysis showed excellent reproducibility for HARPERELLA (3 T, -0.003 +/- 0.032; 1.5 T, -0.003 +/- 0.038) and V-SHARP (3 T, -0.003 +/- 0.027; 1.5 T, -0.003 +/- 0.029). Susceptibility values of these 2 algorithms were highly correlated with good agreement (3T, R2 = 0.961; 1.5 T, R2 = 0.931) (3 T, 0.009 +/- 0.023; 1.5 T, -0.003 +/- 0.049). [Conclusions]: Quantitative susceptibility mapping with HARPERELLA and V-SHARP demonstrated good reproducibility at 3 T and 1.5 T, and QSM with V-SHARP demonstrated good consistency at 3 T and 1.5 T.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Health, Incen
dc.rights© 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health. This is a non-final version of an article published in final form in Investigative Radiology: Post Author Corrections: April 18, 2015 doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000159.en
dc.rights許諾条件により本文ファイルは2016-04-18に公開.ja
dc.rightsこの論文は出版社版でありません。引用の際には出版社版をご確認ご利用ください。ja
dc.rightsThis is not the published version. Please cite only the published version.en
dc.subjectmagnetic resonance imagingen
dc.titleQuantitative Susceptibility Mapping at 3 T and 1.5 T: Evaluation of Consistency and Reproducibility.en
dc.typejournal article-
dc.type.niitypeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.jtitleInvestigative radiologyen
dc.identifier.volume50-
dc.identifier.issue8-
dc.identifier.spage522-
dc.identifier.epage530-
dc.relation.doi10.1097/RLI.0000000000000159-
dc.textversionauthor-
dc.startdate.bitstreamsavailable2016-04-18-
dc.identifier.pmid25900085-
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
datacite.date.available2016-04-18-
出現コレクション:学術雑誌掲載論文等

アイテムの簡略レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。