Downloads: 262

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
j.resuscitation.2015.02.015.pdf181.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNishiyama, Chikaja
dc.contributor.authorIwami, Takuja
dc.contributor.authorMurakami, Yukikoja
dc.contributor.authorKitamura, Tetsuhisaja
dc.contributor.authorOkamoto, Yoshioja
dc.contributor.authorMarukawa, Seishiroja
dc.contributor.authorSakamoto, Tetsuyaja
dc.contributor.authorKawamura, Takashija
dc.contributor.alternative石見, 拓ja
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-16T06:03:18Z-
dc.date.available2015-09-16T06:03:18Z-
dc.date.issued2015-05-
dc.identifier.issn0300-9572ja
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2433/199884-
dc.description.abstract[Objectives]To evaluate the long-term effectiveness of 15-min refresher basic life support (BLS) training following 45-min chest compression-only BLS training. [Methods]After the 45-min chest compression-only BLS training, the participants were randomly assigned to either the refresher BLS training group, which received a 15-min refresher training 6 months after the initial training (refresher training group), or to the control group, which did not receive refresher training. Participants’ resuscitation skills were evaluated by a 2-min case-based scenario test 1 year after the initial training. The primary outcome measure was the number of appropriate chest compressions during a 2-min test period. [Results]140 participants were enrolled and 112 of them completed this study. The number of appropriate chest compressions performed during the 2-min test period was significantly greater in the refresher training group (68.9 ± 72.3) than in the control group (36.3 ± 50.8,p = 0.009). Time without chest compressions was significantly shorter in the refresher training group (16.1 ± 2.1 s versus 26.9 ± 3.7 s, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in time to chest compression (29.6 ± 16.7 s versus 34.4 ± 17.8 s, p = 0.172) and AED use between the groups. [Conclusions]A short-time refresher BLS training program 6 months after the initial training can help trainees retain chest compression skills for up to 1 year. Repeated BLS training, even if very short, would be adopted to keep acquired CPR quality optimal (UMIN-CTR UMIN 000004101).ja
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfja
dc.language.isoengja
dc.publisherElsevierja
dc.rights© 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. NOTICE: this is the author's version of a work that was accepted for publication in "Resuscitation". Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in [Resuscitation, Volume 90, May 2015, Pages 56–60, doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.02.015]ja
dc.rightsThe full-text file will be made open to the public on 1 June 2016 in accordance with publisher's 'Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving'.ja
dc.subjectBasic life support (BLS)ja
dc.subjectCardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)ja
dc.subjectRetrainingja
dc.subjectChest compressionja
dc.subjectEducationja
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trialja
dc.titleEffectiveness of simplified 15-min refresher BLS training program: a randomized controlled trial.ja
dc.type.niitypeJournal Articleja
dc.identifier.jtitleResuscitationja
dc.identifier.volume90ja
dc.identifier.spage56ja
dc.identifier.epage60ja
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.02.015ja
dc.textversionauthorja
dc.startdate.bitstreamsavailable2016-06-01-
dc.identifier.pmid25724354-
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Show simple item record

Export to RefWorks


Export Format: 


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.