ダウンロード数: 683

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
sas_5_2_219.pdf775.9 kBAdobe PDF見る/開く
完全メタデータレコード
DCフィールド言語
dc.contributor.authorTejapira, Kasianen
dc.contributor.alternativeเตชะพีระ, เกษียรth
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-15T02:27:00Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-15T02:27:00Z-
dc.date.issued2016-08-
dc.identifier.issn2186-7275-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2433/216603-
dc.description.abstractI intend to approach the current decade-long political crisis in Thailand from two perspectives: power shift and cultural political hegemony. From a comparative historical point of view, the current crisis fits into a pattern of cyclical power shifts in modern Thai politics in which an initial opening/liberalization of the economy led to the emergence of a new class/social group, which in turn grew and rose to politically challenge the existing regime of the old elites and their allies. An extended period of political contest and turmoil ensued, with varying elements of radical transformation and setback, reaction and compromise, which usually ended in a measure of regime change. A remarkable feature of the ongoing power shift in Thailand is the ironic reversal of political stance and role of the established urban middle class, who have turned from the erstwhile vanguard democratizers of the previous power shift into latter-day anti-democratizers of the current one, with the globally dominant ideology of liberal democracy being torn asunder as a result. The preferred strategy of recent anti-democratic movements has been violent street politics and forceful anarchic mass occupation of key administrative, business, and transportation centers to bring about socioeconomic paralysis, virtual state failure, and government collapse. The aim is to create a condition of un-governability in the country that will allow the movement's leaders to exploit King Bhumibol's hardearned hegemonic position and the deep-seated constitutional ambiguity of the locus of sovereignty in Thailand's "Democratic Regime of Government with the King as Head of the State" so as to appeal to heaven for divine political intervention. This has inadvertently resulted in the increasing politicization of the monarchy and concomitant decline of royal hegemony as the symbolic ties between democracy and the monarchy in Thailand become unraveled. In this light, the latest coup by the NCPO military junta—on May 22, 2014—was a statist/bureaucratic politic attempt to salvage the cohesiveness of the Thai state apparatus in the face of the societally self-destructive, protracted political class conflict that has reached a stalemate and the aggravatingly vulnerable monarchy.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherCenter for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto Universityen
dc.rights©Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto Universityen
dc.subjectThai politicsen
dc.subjectclass conflicten
dc.subjectmonarchyen
dc.subjectliberal democracyen
dc.subjectmass movementen
dc.subject.ndc292.3-
dc.title<Articles>The Irony of Democratization and the Decline of Royal Hegemony in Thailanden
dc.typedepartmental bulletin paper-
dc.type.niitypeDepartmental Bulletin Paper-
dc.identifier.ncidAA1256533X-
dc.identifier.jtitleSoutheast Asian Studiesen
dc.identifier.volume5-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage219-
dc.identifier.epage237-
dc.relation.doi10.20495/seas.5.2_219-
dc.textversionpublisher-
dc.sortkey03-
dc.addressFaculty of Political Science, Thammasat Universityen
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
出現コレクション:Vol.5 No.2

アイテムの簡略レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。