ダウンロード数: 440
このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル | 記述 | サイズ | フォーマット | |
---|---|---|---|---|
j.amper.2014.12.002.pdf | 398.86 kB | Adobe PDF | 見る/開く |
完全メタデータレコード
DCフィールド | 値 | 言語 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Maswana, Sayako | en |
dc.contributor.author | Kanamaru, Toshiyuki | en |
dc.contributor.author | Tajino, Akira | en |
dc.contributor.alternative | 田地野, 彰 | ja |
dc.contributor.alternative | 金丸, 敏幸 | ja |
dc.contributor.transcription | タジノ, アキラ | ja |
dc.contributor.transcription | カナマル, トシユキ | ja |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-30T05:55:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-01-30T05:55:13Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015-01-16 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2215-0390 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2433/217923 | - |
dc.description.abstract | While many genre researchers have examined the rhetorical structure of research articles in various disciplines, few have investigated the complete structure of articles for students in engineering, a discipline that includes a wide range of fields. Using Swales' move framework (1990), this paper analyzes the rhetorical structure of 67 engineering research articles from five subdisciplines: structural engineering, environmental engineering, electrical engineering, chemical engineering, and computer science. Six engineering researchers participated in the study by coding texts of full-length papers into moves and steps. The study found that the abstract, introduction, and concluding sections and some of their moves were conventional across all subdisciplines. The finding of no common move patterns throughout the papers across the subdisciplines is explained by the differences in the nature of research in each field. There were, however, limited subdisciplinary similarities such as the use of Move 5, Step 2 observed in environmental, electrical, and chemical engineering. The study results provide practical pedagogical resources, a theoretical background to guide writing in an engineering school, and implications for collaboration with researchers in specialized fields. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd | en |
dc.rights | © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4. 0/). | en |
dc.subject | Disciplinary variation | en |
dc.subject | Engineering research articles | en |
dc.subject | Move analysis | en |
dc.subject | Rhetorical structure | en |
dc.subject | Subdisciplines | en |
dc.title | Move analysis of research articles across five engineering fields: What they share and what they do not | en |
dc.type | journal article | - |
dc.type.niitype | Journal Article | - |
dc.identifier.jtitle | Ampersand | en |
dc.identifier.volume | 2 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 11 | - |
dc.relation.doi | 10.1016/j.amper.2014.12.002 | - |
dc.textversion | publisher | - |
dc.address | 国際高等教育院国際高等教育院附属国際学術言語教育センター英語教室教授 | en |
dc.address | 国際高等教育院国際高等教育院附属国際学術言語教育センター英語教室准教授 | en |
dc.address.alternative | Kyoto University | en |
dc.address.alternative | Kyoto University | en |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | - |
出現コレクション: | 学術雑誌掲載論文等 |
このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。