ダウンロード数: 114

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
journal.pone.0216956.pdf549.02 kBAdobe PDF見る/開く
完全メタデータレコード
DCフィールド言語
dc.contributor.authorUeda, Takashien
dc.contributor.authorTakesue, Yoshioen
dc.contributor.authorTokimatsu, Isseien
dc.contributor.authorMiyazaki, Taigaen
dc.contributor.authorNakada-Motokawa, Nanaen
dc.contributor.authorNagao, Mikien
dc.contributor.authorNakajima, Kazuhikoen
dc.contributor.authorMikamo, Hiroshigeen
dc.contributor.authorYamagishi, Yukaen
dc.contributor.authorKasahara, Keien
dc.contributor.authorYoshihara, Shingoen
dc.contributor.authorUkimura, Akiraen
dc.contributor.authorYoshida, Koichiroen
dc.contributor.authorYoshinaga, Naomien
dc.contributor.authorIzumi, Masaakien
dc.contributor.authorKakeya, Hiroshien
dc.contributor.authorYamada, Koichien
dc.contributor.authorKawamura, Hidekien
dc.contributor.authorEndou, Kazuoen
dc.contributor.authorYamanaka, Kazuakien
dc.contributor.authorYoshioka, Mutsunobuen
dc.contributor.authorAmino, Kayokoen
dc.contributor.authorIkeuchi, Hirokien
dc.contributor.authorUchino, Motoien
dc.contributor.authorMiyazaki, Yoshitsuguen
dc.contributor.alternative長尾, 美紀ja
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-13T05:44:41Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-13T05:44:41Z-
dc.date.issued2019-05-23-
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2433/244033-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The incidence of ocular candidiasis (OC) in patients with candidemia varies across different reports, and the issue of whether routine ophthalmoscopy improves outcomes has been raised. This study investigated the incidence of OC and evaluate whether the extent of OC impacts the clinical outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study included non-neutropenic patients with candidemia who underwent treatment at one of 15 medical centers between 2010 and 2016. Chorioretinitis without other possible causes for the ocular lesions and endophthalmitis was classified as a probable OC. If signs of chorioretinitis were observed in patients with a systemic disease that causes similar ocular lesions, they were classified as a possible OC. Results: In total, 781 of 1089 patients with candidemia underwent an ophthalmic examination. The prevalence of OC was 19.5%. The time from the collection of a positive blood culture to the initial ophthalmic examination was 5.0 ± 3.9 days in patients with OC. The leading isolate was Candida albicans (77.9%). Possible OC was associated with unsuccessful treatments (resolution of ocular findings) (odds ratio: 0.354, 95% confidence interval: 0.141–0.887), indicating an overdiagnosis in patients with a possible OC. If these patients were excluded, the incidence fell to 12.8%. Endophthalmitis and/or macular involvement, both of which require aggressive therapy, were detected in 43.1% of patients; a significantly higher incidence of visual symptoms was observed in these patients. Conclusion: Even when early routine ophthalmic examinations were performed, a high incidence of advanced ocular lesions was observed. These results suggest that routine ophthalmic examinations are still warranted in patients with candidemia.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)en
dc.rights© 2019 Ueda et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en
dc.titleThe incidence of endophthalmitis or macular involvement and the necessity of a routine ophthalmic examination in patients with candidemiaen
dc.typejournal article-
dc.type.niitypeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.jtitlePloS oneen
dc.identifier.volume14-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.relation.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0216956-
dc.textversionpublisher-
dc.identifier.artnume0216956-
dc.identifier.pmid31120928-
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
出現コレクション:学術雑誌掲載論文等

アイテムの簡略レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。