このアイテムのアクセス数: 127

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
journal.pone.0203594.pdf3.01 MBAdobe PDF見る/開く
タイトル: Twitter use in scientific communication revealed by visualization of information spreading by influencers within half a year after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident
著者: Tsubokura, Masaharu
Onoue, Yosuke
Torii, Hiroyuki A.
Suda, Saori
Mori, Kohei
Nishikawa, Yoshitaka  kyouindb  KAKEN_id  orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3313-1990 (unconfirmed)
Ozaki, Akihiko
Uno, Kazuko
著者名の別形: 坪倉, 正治
鳥居, 寛之
須田, 沙織
西川, 佳孝
尾崎, 章彦
宇野, 賀津子
発行日: 7-Sep-2018
出版者: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
誌名: PLOS ONE
巻: 13
号: 9
論文番号: e0203594
抄録: Scientific communication through social media, particularly Twitter has been gaining importance in recent years. As such, it is critical to understand how information is transmitted and dispersed through outlets such as Twitter, particularly in emergency situations where there is an urgent need to relay scientific information. The purpose of this study is to examine how original tweets and retweets on Twitter were used to diffuse radiation related information after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident. Out of the Twitter database, we purchased all tweets (including replies) and retweets related to Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident and or radiation sent from March 2nd, 2011 to September 15th, 2011. This time frame represents the first six months after the East Japan earthquake, which occurred on March 11th, 2011. Using the obtained data, we examined the number of tweets and retweets and found that only a small number of Twitter users were the source of the original posts that were retweeted during the study period. We have termed these specific accounts as “influencers”. We identified the top 100 influencers and classified the contents of their tweets into 3 groups by analyzing the document vectors of the text. Then, we examined the number of retweets for each of the 3 groups of influencers, and created a retweet network diagram to assess how the contents of their tweets were being spread. The keyword “radiation” was mentioned in over 24 million tweets and retweets during the study period. Retweets accounted for roughly half (49.7%) of this number, and the top 2% of Twitter accounts defined as “influencers” were the source of the original posts that accounted for 80.3% of the total retweets. The majority of the top 100 influencers had individual Twitter accounts bearing real names. While retweets were intensively diffused within a fixed population, especially within the same groups with similar document vectors, a group of influencers accounted for the majority of retweets one month after the disaster, and the share of each group did not change even after proven scientific information became more available.
著作権等: © 2018 Tsubokura et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2433/250768
DOI(出版社版): 10.1371/journal.pone.0203594
PubMed ID: 30192829
出現コレクション:学術雑誌掲載論文等

アイテムの詳細レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。