ダウンロード数: 48

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
seinan-asia_090_53.pdf625.55 kBAdobe PDF見る/開く
完全メタデータレコード
DCフィールド言語
dc.contributor.author野田, 仁ja
dc.contributor.alternativeNoda, Jinen
dc.contributor.transcriptionノダ, ジンja-Kana
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-24T10:00:52Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-24T10:00:52Z-
dc.date.issued2020-06-30-
dc.identifier.issn0910-3708-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2433/260542-
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims to analyze the conflict resolution system established in Xinjiang between the Qing and Russian empires after the conclusion of the St. Petersburg Treaty (1881). The "International Assembly Court" (Mezhdunarodnyi s''ezd in Russian ; hereinafter IAC) was introduced to resolve legal cases brought by subjects of both empires, and the system relied not on imperial laws, but on indigenous customary laws, especially those of Kazakh nomads and Islamic Sharia law. It is true that the IAC (1886-1915) originated from a similar institution in Central Asia under Russian rule. However, the IAC in Xinjiang always required the ereje (detailed regulations), which embodied the adat, Kazakh nomads' customary laws. Moreover, the cases heard in the IAC sometimes included litigation brought by the non-Muslim population. In this context, the Russo-Qing IAC discussed here was different from assembly courts of the Turkestan and Steppe regions. We have to pay attention to the fact that the IAC relied on not only nomadic customary laws, but also the Islamic Sharia. This enabled Muslims other than Kazakh Muslims (originally included in the system) like the Taranchi and Dungan (or Hui Muslims) to also approach the IAC for resolution of disputes. In addition to the IAC, the court within the consulate also tried to entrust the legal procedures to the prevalent customary laws. This possibly reflected Russia's plan to reduce the burden of the Russian consulates in Xinjiang and secure justice through local customs. From the Qing empire's perspective, using the logic of huili (Islamic manner) or fashi (taking an oath) that were regulated by the ereje, rather than imposing its own legislation, was expected to result in a massive resolution of undecided legal cases, including those involving non-Muslim ethnic groups in Xinjiang. Thus, as the Qing archives indicate, the Qing administration continued to have an optimistic view of the IAC system. Both empires could operate assembly meetings regularly and get results to some extent, but the Russian authorities found the IAC system more arduous.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isojpn-
dc.publisher西南アジア研究会ja
dc.publisher.alternativeThe Society for Western and Southern Asiatic Studies, Kyoto Universityen
dc.rights許諾条件により本文は2023-06-30に公開ja
dc.subject慣習法ja
dc.subjectカザフja
dc.subject紛争解決ja
dc.subjectシャリーアja
dc.subject国境ja
dc.subjectCustomary lawen
dc.subjectKazakhsen
dc.subjectconflict resolutionen
dc.subjectShariaen
dc.subjectborderen
dc.subject.ndc227-
dc.title<論文>新疆における露清間の国際集会裁判の運用 --帝国と民族の境界をこえて--ja
dc.title.alternative<Article>Operation of the Russo-Qing Assembly Court in Xinjiang : Beyond the Imperial Border and Ethnic Boundariesen
dc.typejournal article-
dc.type.niitypeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.ncidAN00128737-
dc.identifier.jtitle西南アジア研究ja
dc.identifier.volume90-
dc.identifier.spage53-
dc.identifier.epage76-
dc.textversionpublisher-
dc.sortkey03-
dc.address東京外国語大学アジア・アフリカ言語文化研究所ja
dc.identifier.selfDOI10.14989/seinan-asia-kenkyu_90_53-
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
datacite.date.available2023-06-30-
datacite.awardNumber15K02914-
datacite.awardNumber19K01015-
dc.identifier.pissn0910-3708-
dc.identifier.jtitle-alternativeBulletin of the Society for Western and Southern Asiatic Studies, Kyoto Universityen
jpcoar.funderName日本学術振興会ja
jpcoar.funderName日本学術振興会ja
jpcoar.funderName.alternativeJapan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)en
jpcoar.funderName.alternativeJapan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)en
出現コレクション:90号

アイテムの簡略レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。