このアイテムのアクセス数: 439

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
67_5_181.pdf598.93 kBAdobe PDF見る/開く
タイトル: 転移性尿路上皮癌に対するGC療法における, Gemcitabine投与後の発熱の臨床的意義の検討: 多施設共同後ろ向き研究
その他のタイトル: Fever after Gemcitabine Administration is a Poor Prognostic Factor in Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma : Multicenter Retrospective Study
著者: 前鼻, 健志  KAKEN_name
田中, 俊明  KAKEN_name
進藤, 哲哉  KAKEN_name
髙橋, 敦  KAKEN_name
伊藤, 直樹  KAKEN_name
田口, 圭介  KAKEN_name
堀田, 裕  KAKEN_name
立木, 仁  KAKEN_name
松川, 雅則  KAKEN_name
安達, 秀樹  KAKEN_name
加藤, 隆一  KAKEN_name
國島, 康晴  KAKEN_name
舛森, 直哉  KAKEN_name
Sapporo Medical University Urologic Oncology Consortium
著者名の別形: MAEHANA, Takeshi
TANAKA, Toshiaki
SHINDO, Tetsuya
TAKAHASHI, Atushi
ITO, Naoki
TAGUCHI, Keisuke
HOTTA, Hiroshi
TACHIKI, Hitoshi
MATSUKAWA, Masanori
ADACHI, Hideki
KATO, Ryuichi
KUNISHIMA, Yasuharu
MASUMORI, Naoya
キーワード: Gemcitabine
Fever
Metastatic urothelial carcinoma
発行日: 31-May-2021
出版者: 泌尿器科紀要刊行会
誌名: 泌尿器科紀要
巻: 67
号: 5
開始ページ: 181
終了ページ: 185
抄録: Gemcitabine (GEM) is currently a standard chemotherapeutic agent for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Fever isknown to be an adverse effect of GEM ; however, itsincidence, etiology and clinical significance have not been evaluated. The objective of this study was to elucidate the characteristics and clinical significance of fever associated with GEM in patients with mUC receiving GEM plus cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy. Between 2005 and 2014, 184 patientswith mUC who received first-line GC therapy at 10 institutions were enrolled. GEM-associated fever (GEMAF) was defined as a body temperature ≥37.5ºC within 96 hours after administration of GEM with no evidence of specific conditions causing fever including infection. Clinical parametersbefore GC therapy were evaluated to determine predictorsof GEMAF. Furthermore, the impact of GEMAF on clinical outcomeswasals o evaluated. The median age was 70 years and median follow-up was 14.2 months. GEMAF wasobs erved in 44 patients (23.9%). In multivariate analysis, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) before chemotherapy was an independent predictive factor for GEMAF (oddsratio 2.450, p=0.041). There was a significant difference in progression-free survival (median 6.7 vs 8.0 months, p=0.031) and cancer-specific survival (median 12.0 vs 15.8 months, p=0.045) between patients with and without GEMAF. Results of this study suggest that GEMAF is a common adverse event of GC therapy for mUC and can be a poor prognostic factor. GEMAF may be associated with systemic inflammatory response induced by the tumor in patients with mUC.
著作権等: 許諾条件により本文は2022-06-01に公開
DOI: 10.14989/ActaUrolJap_67_5_181
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2433/263320
PubMed ID: 34126660
出現コレクション:Vol.67 No.5

アイテムの詳細レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。