Assessment of neurocognitive function in association with WHO grades in gliomas

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: High-grade gliomas are fast-growing and may exhibit more severe neurocognitive function (NCF) decline compared with low-grade gliomas. A comprehensive understanding of the NCF in patients with glioma may be critical for developing effective glioma treatments and rehabilitation interventions. This study evaluated NCF more comprehensively in patients with glioma using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition (WAIS-III) and the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R), and also determined the differences in NCF in relation with the WHO grades of gliomas. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with newly diagnosed glioma were reviewed in the present study. The patients were divided into three groups, Grade II, III, and IV, based on the World Health Organization's classification of tumors of the central nervous system. NCF was assessed using the WAIS-III and WMS-R. RESULTS: There were 14 (40.0%), 7 (20.0%), and 14 (40.0%) patients in the grade II, grade III, and grade IV groups, respectively. The results of the Kruskal-Wallis test showed significant differences in all the scores of the WAIS-III and WMS-R between grade II and grade IV. The scores of the WAIS-III and WMS-R in grade IV patients were borderline for NCF disorders, except in the attention/concentration domain. On the other hand, grade II and III groups had normal scores. CONCLUSION: Therefore, patients with a grade IV glioma presented NCF decline compared to grade II and III glioma. In contrast, the results of the WAIS-III and WMS-R indicated that the NCF of patients with grades II and III glioma was intact.