Downloads: 8

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
peerj-13477.pdf1.93 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMatsuoka, Shunsukeen
dc.contributor.authorSugiyama, Yorikoen
dc.contributor.authorNagano, Marikoen
dc.contributor.authorDoi, Hideyukien
dc.contributor.alternative松岡, 俊将ja
dc.contributor.alternative杉山, 賢子ja
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-25T08:57:25Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-25T08:57:25Z-
dc.date.issued2022-05-27-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2433/275981-
dc.description.abstract[Background] Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a common technique for efficient biodiversity monitoring, especially of microbes. Recently, the usefulness of aquatic eDNA in monitoring the diversity of both terrestrial and aquatic fungi has been suggested. In eDNA studies, different experimental factors, such as DNA extraction kits or methods, can affect the subsequent analyses and the results of DNA metabarcoding. However, few methodological studies have been carried out on eDNA of fungi, and little is known about how experimental procedures can affect the results of biodiversity analysis. In this study, we focused on the effect of DNA extraction method on fungal DNA metabarcoding using freshwater samples obtained from rivers and lakes. [Methods] DNA was extracted from freshwater samples using the DNeasy PowerSoil kit, which is mainly used to extractmicrobial DNA from soil, and the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit, which is commonly used for eDNA studies on animals. We then compared PCR inhibition and fungal DNA metabarcoding results; i.e., operational taxonomic unit (OTU) number and composition of the extracted samples. [Results] No PCR inhibition was detected in any of the samples, and no significant differences in the number of OTUs and OTU compositions were detected between the samples processed using different kits. These results indicate that both DNA extraction kits may provide similar diversity results for the river and lake samples evaluated in this study. Therefore, it may be possible to evaluate the diversity of fungi using a unified experimental method, even with samples obtained for diversity studies on other taxa such as those of animals.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherPeerJen
dc.rights© 2022 Matsuoka et al.en
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectEnvironmental DNAen
dc.subjectFungien
dc.subjectMetabarcodingen
dc.subjectFreshwateren
dc.subjectMethoden
dc.titleInfluence of DNA extraction kits on freshwater fungal DNA metabarcodingen
dc.typejournal article-
dc.type.niitypeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.jtitlePeerJen
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.relation.doi10.7717/peerj.13477-
dc.textversionpublisher-
dc.identifier.artnume13477-
dc.identifier.pmid35651749-
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
datacite.awardNumber20J01732-
datacite.awardNumber.urihttps://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-20J01732/-
dc.identifier.eissn2167-8359-
jpcoar.funderName日本学術振興会ja
jpcoar.awardTitle大規模データを用いた日本のブナ科広葉樹林の外生菌根菌多様性の決定要因探索と予測ja
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Show simple item record

Export to RefWorks


Export Format: 


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons