Downloads: 71

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
j.resplu.2021.100088.pdf326.37 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on bystander interventions, emergency medical service activities, and patient outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Osaka City, Japan
Authors: Nishiyama, Chika  KAKEN_id
Kiyohara, Kosuke
Iwami, Taku  kyouindb  KAKEN_id  orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4150-7065 (unconfirmed)
Hayashida, Sumito
Kiguchi, Takeyuki  kyouindb  KAKEN_id
Matsuyama, Tasuku
Katayama, Yusuke
Shimazu, Takeshi
Kitamura, Tetsuhisa
Author's alias: 西山, 知佳
石見, 拓
木口, 雄之
Keywords: COVID-19
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Bystander CPR
AED
Issue Date: Mar-2021
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Journal title: Resuscitation Plus
Volume: 5
Thesis number: 100088
Abstract: Background: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic may have negatively affected bystander interventions, emergency medical service (EMS) personnel activities, and patient outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This study assessed bystander interventions, EMS activities, and patient outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic era and compared them with those during the non-COVID-19 pandemic era in Osaka City, Japan, where public-access automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are well established. Methods: We conducted this population-based cohort study that included all cases with non-traumatic OHCA treated by EMS personnel and excluded cases with no resuscitation attempt, traumatic cases, cases occurring in healthcare facilities, or cases witnessed by EMS personnel. Data were compared between the COVID-19 pandemic period (February 1, 2020 to July 31, 2020) and the non-COVID-19 pandemic period (February 1, 2019 to July 31, 2019). Results: During the study periods, 1687 patients were eligible for analyses (COVID-19: n = 825; non-COVID-19: n = 862). Patients with OHCA during the COVID-19 pandemic period were significantly less likely to receive bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (COVID-19: 33.0%; non-COVID-19: 41.3%; p < 0.001) and public-access AED pad application (COVID-19: 2.9%; non-COVID-19: 6.1%; p = 0.002) compared with patients during the non-COVID-19 pandemic period. There were no significant differences in 1-month survival with favorable neurological outcomes between the two periods (COVID-19: 4.6%; non-COVID-19: 6.1%; p = 0.196). Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic period did not affect patient outcomes after OHCA but changed bystander behaviors in Osaka City, Japan.
Rights: © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2433/276410
DOI(Published Version): 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100088
PubMed ID: 33554154
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Show full item record

Export to RefWorks


Export Format: 


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons