このアイテムのアクセス数: 178

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
jco.21.00334.pdf667.17 kBAdobe PDF見る/開く
タイトル: Nivolumab Versus Gemcitabine or Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin for Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer: Open-Label, Randomized Trial in Japan (NINJA)
著者: Hamanishi, Junzo
Takeshima, Nobuhiro
Katsumata, Noriyuki
Ushijima, Kimio
Kimura, Tadashi
Takeuchi, Satoshi
Matsumoto, Koji
Ito, Kimihiko
Mandai, Masaki
Nakai, Hidekatsu
Sakuragi, Noriaki
Watari, Hidemichi
Takahashi, Nobutaka
Kato, Hidenori
Hasegawa, Kosei
Yonemori, Kan
Mizuno, Mika
Takehara, Kazuhiro
Niikura, Hitoshi
Sawasaki, Takashi
Nakao, Sari
Saito, Toshiaki
Enomoto, Takayuki
Nagase, Satoru
Suzuki, Nao
Matsumoto, Takashi
Kondo, Eiji
Sonoda, Kenzo
Aihara, Satomi
Aoki, Yoichi
Okamoto, Aikou
Takano, Hirokuni
Kobayashi, Hiroshi
Kato, Hisamori
Terai, Yoshito
Takazawa, Akira
Takahashi, Yusuke
Namba, Yoshinobu
Aoki, Daisuke
Fujiwara, Keiichi
Sugiyama, Toru
Konishi, Ikuo
著者名の別形: 濵西, 潤三
万代, 昌紀
発行日: 20-Nov-2021
出版者: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
誌名: Journal of Clinical Oncology
巻: 39
号: 33
開始ページ: 3671
終了ページ: 3681
抄録: PURPOSE: This phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label study investigated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab versus chemotherapy (gemcitabine [GEM] or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin [PLD]) in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer, received ≤ 1 regimen after diagnosis of resistance, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of ≤ 1. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to nivolumab (240 mg once every 2 weeks [as one cycle]) or chemotherapy (GEM 1000 mg/m2 for 30 minutes [once on days 1, 8, and 15] followed by a week's rest [as one cycle], or PLD 50 mg/m2 once every 4 weeks [as one cycle]). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate, duration of response, and safety. RESULTS: Patients (n = 316) were randomly assigned to nivolumab (n = 157) or GEM or PLD (n = 159) between October 2015 and December 2017. Median OS was 10.1 (95% CI, 8.3 to 14.1) and 12.1 (95% CI, 9.3 to 15.3) months with nivolumab and GEM or PLD, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.3; P = .808). Median PFS was 2.0 (95% CI, 1.9 to 2.2) and 3.8 (95% CI, 3.6 to 4.2) months with nivolumab and GEM or PLD, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.9; P = .002). There was no statistical difference in overall response rate between groups (7.6% v 13.2%; odds ratio, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.2 to 1.3; P = .191). Median duration of response was numerically longer with nivolumab than GEM or PLD (18.7 v 7.4 months). Fewer treatment-related adverse events were observed with nivolumab versus GEM or PLD (61.5% v 98.1%), with no additional or new safety risks. CONCLUSION: Although well-tolerated, nivolumab did not improve OS and showed worse PFS compared with GEM or PLD in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
著作権等: © 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2433/277456
DOI(出版社版): 10.1200/jco.21.00334
PubMed ID: 34473544
出現コレクション:学術雑誌掲載論文等

アイテムの詳細レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このアイテムは次のライセンスが設定されています: クリエイティブ・コモンズ・ライセンス Creative Commons