このアイテムのアクセス数: 90

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
s13102-022-00570-7.pdf1.26 MBAdobe PDF見る/開く
完全メタデータレコード
DCフィールド言語
dc.contributor.authorOta, Megumien
dc.contributor.authorTateuchi, Hiroshigeen
dc.contributor.authorHashiguchi, Takayaen
dc.contributor.authorFujiwara, Karenen
dc.contributor.authorSasaki, Ayanoen
dc.contributor.authorOkumura, Kisekien
dc.contributor.authorIchihashi, Noriakien
dc.contributor.alternative太田, 恵ja
dc.contributor.alternative建内, 宏重ja
dc.contributor.alternative佐々木, 彩乃ja
dc.contributor.alternative奥村, 輝石ja
dc.contributor.alternative市橋, 則明ja
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T09:10:33Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-25T09:10:33Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2433/278837-
dc.description.abstractBackground The movement of targeted subjects can be calculated using the frame subtraction method. However, the validity of this evaluation method of dynamic postural stability has not been clarified yet. This study aimed to verify the validity of the evaluation method for jump landing using the frame subtraction score based on the ground reaction force (GRF). Methods Twenty subjects performed single-leg jump landing, and their dynamic postural stability index (DPSI), medial-lateral stability index (MLSI), anterior-posterior stability index, and vertical stability index (VSI) were calculated from the GRF. Simultaneously, motion images were captured using digital video cameras in the sagittal and frontal planes. After the motion images were analyzed using the frame subtraction method, the frame subtraction scores in the frontal, sagittal, and combined planes were calculated. To confirm its validity, the relationship between the frame subtraction scores and GRF parameters was investigated using Pearson's correlation analysis. Results The frame subtraction scores in the frontal and combined planes were significantly correlated with the DPSI, MLSI, and VSI (r = 0.46-0.75, P < 0.05). Conclusions Therefore, the frame subtraction method could be applied to the evaluation of dynamic postural stability. Markerless systems are deemed useful in clinical practice.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherBMCen
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2022en
dc.rightsThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectFrame subtraction methoden
dc.subjectMotion analysisen
dc.subjectMarkerless systemen
dc.subjectDynamic balanceen
dc.subjectPostural stabilityen
dc.titleValidity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stabilityen
dc.typejournal article-
dc.type.niitypeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.jtitleBMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitationen
dc.identifier.volume14-
dc.relation.doi10.1186/s13102-022-00570-7-
dc.textversionpublisher-
dc.identifier.artnum174-
dc.identifier.pmid36163189-
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
dc.identifier.eissn2052-1847-
出現コレクション:学術雑誌掲載論文等

アイテムの簡略レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このアイテムは次のライセンスが設定されています: クリエイティブ・コモンズ・ライセンス Creative Commons