ダウンロード数: 245
このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル | 記述 | サイズ | フォーマット | |
---|---|---|---|---|
cap_14_159.pdf | 1.12 MB | Adobe PDF | 見る/開く |
タイトル: | <研究論文(原著論文)>WE多元主義に基づくウェルビーイング施策の評価方法論 |
著者: | 加藤, 猛 |
キーワード: | Well-being policy evaluation WE pluralism Consensus building Joint fact-finding |
発行日: | 3-Nov-2023 |
出版者: | 応用哲学会 |
誌名: | Contemporary and Applied Philosophy |
巻: | 14 |
開始ページ: | 159 |
終了ページ: | 175 |
抄録: | Methodologies for evaluating and selecting policies that contribute to the well-being of diverse populations need clarification. To bridge the gap between objective indicators and policies related to well-being, this study shifts from constitutive pluralism based on objective indicators to conceptual pluralism that emphasizes subjective context, and develops from subjective-objective pluralism through individual-group pluralism to WE pluralism and presents a new policy evaluation method that combines joint fact finding based on policy plurality. First, to evaluate policies involving diverse stakeholders, I develop from individual subjectivity-objectivity to individual subjectivity and group intersubjectivity, and then move to a narrow-wide WE pluralism in the gradation of I-family-community-municipality-country-world. Additionally, by referring to some functional forms of well-being, I formulate the dependence of well-being on narrow-wide WE. Finally, given that policies themselves have a plurality of social, ecological, and economic values, I define a set of policies for each of the narrow-wide WE and consider a mapping between the two to provide an evaluation basis. Furthermore, by combining well-being and joint fact-finding on the narrow-wide WE consensus, the policy evaluation method is formulated. The fact-value combined parameter system, combined policy-making approach, and combined impact evaluation are disclosed as examples of implementation. This paper contributes to the realization of a well-being society by bridging philosophical theory and policies based on WE pluralism and presenting a new method of policy evaluation based on subjective context and consensus building. |
記述: | 本稿は、応用哲学会第15回年次研究大会でのワークショップ「わたしたちのウェルビーイングを問う --倫理的課題、評価方法論とその実施--」(2023年4月23日)に基づく。 |
DOI: | 10.14989/285977 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2433/285977 |
関連リンク: | https://jacap.org/journal/ |
出現コレクション: | vol. 14 |
このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。