このアイテムのアクセス数: 4

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
cam4.4303.pdf322.61 kBAdobe PDF見る/開く
タイトル: Clinical implications of using both fluoropyrimidine and paclitaxel in patients with severe peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer: A post hoc study of JCOG1108/WJOG7312G
著者: Arai, Hiroyuki
Inoue, Eisuke
Yamaguchi, Kensei
Boku, Narikazu
Hara, Hiroki
Nishina, Tomohiro
Tsuda, Masahiro
Shitara, Kohei
Shinozaki, Katsunori
Nakamura, Shinichiro
Hyodo, Ichinosuke
Muro, Kei
Sasako, Mitsuru
Terashima, Masanori
Nakajima, Takako E.
著者名の別形: 中島, 貴子
キーワード: FLTAX
gastric cancer
inadequate oral intake
massive ascites
severe peritoneal metastasis
発行日: Nov-2021
出版者: Wiley
誌名: Cancer Medicine
巻: 10
号: 21
開始ページ: 7673
終了ページ: 7682
抄録: Background: In the JCOG1108/WJOG7312G trial, a combination (FLTAX) of 5-fluorouracil (FU) /leucovorin (FL) and paclitaxel (PTX) did not show superiority in overall survival (OS) to FL in untreated patients with severe peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer (GC-SPM), some of whom received second-line chemotherapy with PTX after FL. This post hoc study aimed to investigate the clinical implications of using both FU and PTX either sequentially or in combination for patients with GC-SPM.
Methods: A total of 94 patients were enrolled and categorized into the following three subgroups: patients treated with (1) FL followed by PTX (FL/PTX, 𝘕 = 25), (2) FL followed by best supportive care (BSC) (FL/BSC, 𝘕 = 21), and (3) FLTAX (𝘕 = 48). OS was compared between the subgroups. By comparing baseline factors between the FL/PTX and FL/BSC subgroups, factors preventing the sequential use of PTX (SUP) were explored using logistic regression model. The efficacy of FL and FLTAX was compared according to the presence of risk factors preventing SUP.
Results: The FL/PTX subgroup showed better and equivalent OS compared to the FL/BSC (median 7.8 vs. 2.0 months, 𝘱 < 0.01) and FLTAX (median 7.8 vs. 8.0, 𝘱 = 0.49) subgroups, respectively. Glasgow Prognostic Score 2 and initially unresectable disease were identified as risk factors preventing SUP. Absence of both risks predicted SUP with a sensitivity of 13% and a specificity of 100%, whereas absence of any risks predicted SUP with a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 62%. FLTAX showed better OS than FL in patients with one or two of these risks but worse OS in those with none.
Conclusions: Although sequential use of FU and PTX showed equivalent survival to FLTAX in patients with GC-SPM, FLTAX might be preferable given the difficulty in selecting patients likely to receive sequential use at the initiation of first-line chemotherapy.
著作権等: © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2433/293476
DOI(出版社版): 10.1002/cam4.4303
PubMed ID: 34655175
関連リンク: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/cam4.4303
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/cam4.4303
出現コレクション:学術雑誌掲載論文等

アイテムの詳細レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このアイテムは次のライセンスが設定されています: クリエイティブ・コモンズ・ライセンス Creative Commons