このアイテムのアクセス数: 0
このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル | 記述 | サイズ | フォーマット | |
---|---|---|---|---|
deo2.70083.pdf | 3.69 MB | Adobe PDF | 見る/開く |
タイトル: | Effects of artificial intelligence assistance on endoscopist performance: Comparison of diagnostic performance in superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma detection using video-based models |
著者: | Aoyama, Naoki Nakajo, Keiichiro Sasabe, Maasa Inaba, Atsushi Nakanishi, Yuki ![]() ![]() Seno, Hiroshi Yano, Tomonori |
発行日: | Apr-2026 |
出版者: | Wiley |
誌名: | DEN open |
巻: | 6 |
号: | 1 |
論文番号: | e70083 |
抄録: | Objectives: Superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) detection is crucial. Although narrow-band imaging improves detection, its effectiveness is diminished by inexperienced endoscopists. The effects of artificial intelligence (AI) assistance on ESCC detection by endoscopists remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate an AI model for ESCC detection using endoscopic video analysis and evaluate diagnostic improvements. Methods: Endoscopic videos with and without ESCC lesions were collected from May 2020 to January 2022. The AI model trained on annotated videos and 18 endoscopists (eight experts, 10 non-experts) evaluated their diagnostic performance. After 4 weeks, the endoscopists re-evaluated the test data with AI assistance. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were compared between endoscopists with and without AI assistance. Results: Training data comprised 280 cases (140 with and 140 without lesions), and test data, 115 cases (52 with and 63 without lesions). In the test data, the median lesion size was 14.5 mm (range: 1–100 mm), with pathological depths ranging from high-grade intraepithelial to submucosal neoplasia. The model's sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 76.0%, 79.4%, and 77.2%, respectively. With AI assistance, endoscopist sensitivity (57.4% vs. 66.5%) and accuracy (68.6% vs. 75.9%) improved significantly, while specificity increased slightly (87.0% vs. 91.6%). Experts demonstrated substantial improvements in sensitivity (59.1% vs. 70.0%) and accuracy (72.1% vs. 79.3%). Non-expert accuracy increased significantly (65.8% vs. 73.3%), with slight improvements in sensitivity (56.1% vs. 63.7%) and specificity (81.9% vs. 89.2%). Conclusions: AI assistance enhances ESCC detection and improves endoscopists' diagnostic performance, regardless of experience. |
著作権等: | This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, providedthe original work is properly cited. © 2025 The Author(s). DEN Open published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2433/294691 |
DOI(出版社版): | 10.1002/deo2.70083 |
PubMed ID: | 40322543 |
出現コレクション: | 学術雑誌掲載論文等 |

このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。