このアイテムのアクセス数: 555

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
65-0828.pdf1.28 MBAdobe PDF見る/開く
完全メタデータレコード
DCフィールド言語
dc.contributor.author浅見, 淳之ja
dc.contributor.author張, 文宝ja
dc.contributor.author曹, 力群ja
dc.contributor.author張, 暁輝ja
dc.contributor.author辻井, 博ja
dc.contributor.author松田, 芳郎ja
dc.contributor.alternativeAsami, Atsuyukien
dc.contributor.alternativeZhang, Wenbaoen
dc.contributor.alternativeCao, Liqunen
dc.contributor.alternativeZhang, Xiaohuien
dc.contributor.alternativeTsujii, Hiroshien
dc.contributor.alternativeMatsuda, Yoshiroen
dc.contributor.transcriptionアサミ, アツユキja-Kana
dc.contributor.transcriptionツジイ, ヒロシja-Kana
dc.contributor.transcriptionマツダ, ヨシロウja-Kana
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-07T10:31:52Z-
dc.date.available2008-05-07T10:31:52Z-
dc.date.issued2001-12-25-
dc.identifier.issn1341-8947-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2433/54286-
dc.descriptionこの論文は農林水産省で電子化されました。ja
dc.description.abstractContract lands were equally allocated among farm households according to the number of family members under self responsibility household system in rural China. The purpose of this paper is to discuss about the method of equal allocation of contract lands and test the equality of allocation statistically. Equality of contract land allocation is realized by classification of land fertility and determination by lot. First, village committee evaluated objectively whole village lands and classified these into 3 groups, that is, upper grade land, middle grade land and lower grade land. After that two types of lot are adopted. One is family lot and the other is individual lot. Family lot means that family draws a lot among land groups which include 3 grade lands equally. Individual lot means that individual draws a lot among each grade of lands. Anyhow, equality can be realized by lot. Equality of contract land allocation can be tested by regression from number of family members to land acreage of each household. In order to compute this regression, we use the results of fixed observation survey of each farm households done by Research Center of Rural Economy. Equality of allocation can be supported by the results of this regression. In addition, we test equality of the food land allocation and the responsibility land allocation by regression. In computed results, some villages where equality is not realized can be found. As for two-land system, equality is not necessarily supported.en
dc.language.isojpn-
dc.publisher京都大学大学院農学研究科生物資源経済学専攻ja
dc.publisher.alternativeNatural Resource Economics Division Graduate School of Agriculture Kyoto Universityen
dc.subject.ndc610-
dc.title中国の請負農地配分に関する一考察ja
dc.title.alternativeA Study of Contract Lands Allocation in Rural Chinaen
dc.typedepartmental bulletin paper-
dc.type.niitypeDepartmental Bulletin Paper-
dc.identifier.ncidAN10529053-
dc.identifier.jtitle京都大学生物資源経済研究ja
dc.identifier.volume7-
dc.identifier.spage83-
dc.identifier.epage100-
dc.textversionpublisher-
dc.sortkey05-
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
dc.identifier.pissn1341-8947-
dc.identifier.jtitle-alternativeThe Natural Resource Economics Review, Kyoto Universityen
出現コレクション:No.7

アイテムの簡略レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。