地域計画における関係農家の同質性条件の集落域と旧村域との比較分析

Abstract

Already we proved that to adopt the Kyuson area for regional unit was the usefull and acceptable method for rural planning as well as the Shuraku area. In our method, the Shuraku area has some following merits: 1) easily can get the data of planning, 2) easily get the participation of all farmers, 3) hemogeneity of the farmers are very high, as a result, the planning can be done very easily, 4) the agreement of all farmers for the planning can be get easily. But this method has some problems such as: 1) elements of planning are wider than Shuraku area, 2) in the partial plan of the planning, the optimal size can not obtain, 3) because of the small area the planning can not reach to future complete respect. On the other hand, in the Kyuson area planning method the same merits as the above mentioned for Shuraku area are acceptable. Also those mentioned problems can be easily covered by this method. Now, the most important problem for the rural planning is to obtain the hemogeneity of all farmers in the area. In the case of hemogeneous pattern we can easily get the agreement of all farmers for the planning. Also in this case the planning is more practical. And this hemogeneous pattern can be observed in the Kyuson area. This paper is trying to make clear the hemogeneous pattern of Kyuson area empiricaly. Case study area is Nanao City in Ishikawa Prefecture. Comparative analysis between the Shuraku area (81 areas) and the Kyuson area (9 areas) was done. As method of analyzing the component analysis and cIuster analysis were used. As a result, the Kyuson area method shows high acceptablility.