ダウンロード数: 755
このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル | 記述 | サイズ | フォーマット | |
---|---|---|---|---|
aaas_7_18.pdf | 277.53 kB | Adobe PDF | 見る/開く |
タイトル: | Shaykh succession in Turkish Sufi lineages (19th and 20th centuries): conflicts, reforms and transmission of spiritual enlightenment (The Tariqa's cohesional power and the Shaykhhood succession question) |
著者: | Zarcone, Thierry |
発行日: | Sep-2007 |
出版者: | 京都大学大学院アジア・アフリカ地域研究研究科 |
誌名: | アジア・アフリカ地域研究 |
巻: | 7 |
号: | 1 |
開始ページ: | 18 |
終了ページ: | 35 |
抄録: | This article examines the question of the succession of the Sufi shaykhs as heads of a lodge (tekke) or as great masters of a lineage (brotherhood) in the Ottoman Empire in 19th and 20th centuries and shows that there was an important difference between the rule of hereditary succession followed by the tekkes from the beginning of Ottoman history to the classical period (16th-17th century) and the same rule which spread in the 19th century. This study investigates the two principles upon which the legitimacy for succession is established and the heated controversies and quarrels around it. These two principles are: 1. hereditary succession (evladiyet in Ottoman Turkish), which was in general the rule within Sufi s orders; and, 2. succession by discipleship, on grounds of learning or other merits. This study demonstrates that the principle of hereditary succession was well cultivated in the Centralized Sufi Orders (Mevleviye, and Bektaşiye) and in some Mother-Lodges of other lineages (e.g. Kâdiriye), and that there were some famous Sufi families which had strengthened this principle and became genuine spiritual dynasties (e.g. Mevlevî, Halvetî). Conversely, some Sufi lineages, like the Nakşibendiye, were inclined to favour the succession by discipleship. The second section of this study focuses on the drastic contestation of the principle of hereditary succession by openminded and reformist Sufi s since the beginning of the 19th century and particularly in the fi rst decades of the 20th century. It analyses the reform of the hereditary succession, especially the measures adopted by several organisations, like the "Council of Shaykhs" (Meclis-i Meşayih) in the mid-19th century, and the project, never implemented, of a "Sufi School" (Medresetü'l-Meşayih) for the education of the sons of the Shaykhs in the beginning of the 20th century. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2433/80102 |
出現コレクション: | No.7-1 |
このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。