このアイテムのアクセス数: 171
完全メタデータレコード
| DCフィールド | 値 | 言語 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | McAleer, Michael | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-10-26T03:04:23Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2010-10-26T03:04:23Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2010-08 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2433/129614 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper examines the novelty and usefulness of two new journal performance metrics, namely the Eigenfactor Score and Article Influence Score, using ISI data for 2009 for the 200 most highly cited journals in each of the sciences and social sciences, and compares them with existing ISI metrics, namely Total Citations and the 5-year Impact Factor (5YIF) of a journal. It is shown that the sciences and social sciences are different in terms of the strength of the relationship of journal performance metrics, although the actual relationships are very similar. | en |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Institute of Economic Research, Kyoto University | en |
| dc.publisher.alternative | 京都大学経済研究所 | ja |
| dc.subject.ndc | 330 | - |
| dc.title | Article Influence Score = 5YIF divided by 2 | en |
| dc.type | research report | - |
| dc.type.niitype | Research Paper | - |
| dc.identifier.jtitle | KIER Discussion Paper | en |
| dc.identifier.volume | 709 | - |
| dc.textversion | author | - |
| dc.sortkey | 00709 | - |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | - |
| 出現コレクション: | KIER Discussion Paper (英文版) | |
このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。