Downloads: 445

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
DP756.pdf319.27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: How are Journal Impact, Prestige and Article Influence Related? An Application to Neuroscience
Authors: Chang, Chia-Lin
McAleer, Michael
Oxley, Les
Keywords: Impact factor
Prestige
Immediacy
Eigenfactor
Article Influence
h-index
C3PO
Zinfluence
PI-BETA
STAR
IFI
Cited Article influence
Issue Date: Jan-2011
Publisher: Institute of Economic Research, Kyoto University
Journal title: KIER Discussion Paper
Volume: 756
Abstract: The paper analyses the leading journals in Neurosciences using quantifiable Research Assessment Measures (RAM), highlights the similarities and differences in alternative RAM, shows that several RAM capture similar performance characteristics of highly cited journals, and shows that some other RAM have low correlations with each other, and hence add significant informational value. Alternative RAM are discussed for the Thomson Reuters ISI Web of Science database (hereafter ISI). The RAM that are calculated annually or updated daily include the classic 2-year impact factor (2YIF), 5-year impact factor (5YIF), Immediacy (or zero-year impact factor (0YIF)), Eigenfactor score, Article Influence score, C3PO (Citation Performance Per Paper Online), h-index, Zinfluence, PI-BETA (Papers Ignored - By Even The Authors), 2-year and historical Self-citation Threshold Approval Ratings (STAR), Impact Factor Inflation (IFI), and Cited Article Influence (CAI). The RAM are analysed for 26 highly cited journals in the ISI category of Neurosciences. The paper finds that the Eigenfactor score and PI-BETA are not highly correlated with the other RAM scores, so that they convey additional information regarding journal rankings, that Article Influence is highly correlated with some existing RAM, so that it has little informative incremental value, and that CAI has additional informational value to that of Article Influence. Harmonic mean rankings of the 13 RAM criteria for the 26 highly cited journals are also presented. Emphasizing the 2-year impact factor of a journal to the exclusion of other informative RAM criteria is shown to lead to a distorted evaluation of journal performance and influence, especially given the informative value of several other RAM.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2433/134638
Related Link: http://ideas.repec.org/p/kyo/wpaper/756.html
Appears in Collections:KIER Discussion Paper (English)

Show full item record

Export to RefWorks


Export Format: 


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.