ダウンロード数: 426
このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル | 記述 | サイズ | フォーマット | |
---|---|---|---|---|
j.radonc.2014.01.014.pdf | 516.76 kB | Adobe PDF | 見る/開く |
タイトル: | Intra- and interfractional variations in geometric arrangement between lung tumours and implanted markers. |
著者: | Ueki, Nami Matsuo, Yukinori https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4372-8259 (unconfirmed) Nakamura, Mitsuhiro Mukumoto, Nobutaka https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4569-3379 (unconfirmed) Iizuka, Yusuke https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1994-0222 (unconfirmed) Miyabe, Yuki Sawada, Akira Mizowaki, Takashi https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8135-8746 (unconfirmed) Kokubo, Masaki Hiraoka, Masahiro |
著者名の別形: | 松尾, 幸憲 |
キーワード: | Lung cancer Fiducial marker Positional variation 4DCT |
発行日: | Mar-2014 |
出版者: | Elsevier Ireland Ltd. |
誌名: | Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology |
巻: | 110 |
号: | 3 |
開始ページ: | 523 |
終了ページ: | 528 |
抄録: | [Purpose]To quantify the intra- and interfractional variations between lung tumours and implanted markers.[Materials and methods]Gold markers were implanted transbronchially around a lung tumour in fifteen patients. They underwent four-dimensional computed tomography scans twice, and the centroids of the tumour and markers were determined. Intrafractional variations were defined as the residual tumour motions relative to the markers due to respiration from the end-exhale phase. Interfractional variations were defined as the residual setup errors after correction for the position of the implanted markers in end-exhale phase images.[Results]The intrafractional variations differed between patients. The root mean squares of standard deviations for each phase were 0.6, 0.9, and 1.5 mm in the right–left, anterior–posterior, and superior–inferior directions, respectively. The maximum difference in intrafractional variation among 10 phases was correlated with the amplitude of tumour motion in all directions and the tumour-marker distance in the anterior–posterior and superior–inferior directions. The interfractional variations were within 2.5 mm.[Conclusions]The intrafractional variations differed according to the amount of tumour motion and the tumour-marker distance. Additionally, interfractional variations of up to 2.5 mm were observed. Thus, a corresponding margin should be considered during implanted marker-based beam delivery to account for these variations. |
著作権等: | © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. この論文は出版社版でありません。引用の際には出版社版をご確認ご利用ください。 This is not the published version. Please cite only the published version. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2433/187802 |
DOI(出版社版): | 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.01.014 |
PubMed ID: | 24560763 |
出現コレクション: | 学術雑誌掲載論文等 |
このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。