Access count of this item: 256

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
joa.12180.pdf669.27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Patterns of morphological variation in enamel-dentin junction and outer enamel surface of human molars.
Authors: Morita, Wataru
Yano, Wataru
Nagaoka, Tomohito
Abe, Mikiko
Ohshima, Hayato
Nakatsukasa, Masato  kyouindb  KAKEN_id  orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6897-8027 (unconfirmed)
Author's alias: 森田, 航
Keywords: developmental constraints
evolvability
geometric morphometrics
morphological variability
odontogenesis
Issue Date: 1-Apr-2014
Publisher: wiley
Journal title: Journal of anatomy
Volume: 224
Issue: 6
Start page: 669
End page: 680
Abstract: Tooth crown patterning is governed by the growth and folding of the inner enamel epithelium (IEE) and the following enamel deposition forms outer enamel surface (OES). We hypothesized that overall dental crown shape and covariation structure are determined by processes that configurate shape at the enamel-dentine junction (EDJ), the developmental vestige of IEE. This this hypothesis was tested by comparing patterns of morphological variation between EDJ and OES in human permanent maxillary first molar (UM1) and deciduous second molar (um2). Using geometric morphometric methods, we described morphological variation and covariation between EDJ and OES, and evaluated the strength of two components of phenotypic variability, canalization and morphological integration, in addition to the relevant evolutionary flexibility, i.e. the ability to respond to selective pressure. The strength of covariation between EDJ and OES was greater in um2 than in UM1, and the way that multiple traits covary between EDJ and OES was different between these teeth. The variability analyses showed that EDJ had less shape variation and a higher level of morphological integration than OES, which indicated that canalization and morphological integration acted as developmental constraints. These tendencies were greater in UM1 than in um2. On the other hand, EDJ and OES had a comparable level of evolvability in these teeth. Amelogenesis could play a significant role in tooth shape and covariation structure, and its influence was not constant among teeth, which may be responsible for the differences in the rate and/or period of enamel formation.
Rights: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Morita, W., Yano, W., Nagaoka, T., Abe, M., Ohshima, H. and Nakatsukasa, M. (2014), Patterns of morphological variation in enamel–dentin junction and outer enamel surface of human molars. Journal of Anatomy, 224: 669–680, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.12180. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.
この論文は出版社版でありません。引用の際には出版社版をご確認ご利用ください。
This is not the published version. Please cite only the published version.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2433/198842
DOI(Published Version): 10.1111/joa.12180
PubMed ID: 24689536
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Show full item record

Export to RefWorks


Export Format: 


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.