このアイテムのアクセス数: 184

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
acm2.12324.pdf447.05 kBAdobe PDF見る/開く
タイトル: Quality assurance of geometric accuracy based on an electronic portal imaging device and log data analysis for Dynamic WaveArc irradiation
著者: Hirashima, Hideaki  kyouindb  KAKEN_id  orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1548-1970 (unconfirmed)
Miyabe, Yuki  KAKEN_id
Nakamura, Mitsuhiro  kyouindb  KAKEN_id
Mukumoto, Nobutaka  KAKEN_id  orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4569-3379 (unconfirmed)
Mizowaki, Takashi  kyouindb  KAKEN_id  orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8135-8746 (unconfirmed)
Hiraoka, Masahiro
著者名の別形: 平島, 英明
宮部, 結城
中村, 光宏
椋本, 宜学
溝脇, 尚志
平岡, 眞寛
キーワード: Dynamic WaveArc
electronic portal imaging device
log data
quality assurance
発行日: May-2018
出版者: Wiley
誌名: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
巻: 19
号: 3
開始ページ: 234
終了ページ: 242
抄録: The purpose of this study was to develop a simple verification method for the routine quality assurance (QA) of Dynamic WaveArc (DWA) irradiation using electronic portal imaging device (EPID) images and log data analysis. First, an automatic calibration method utilizing the outermost multileaf collimator (MLC) slits was developed to correct the misalignment between the center of the EPID and the beam axis. Moreover, to verify the detection accuracy of the MLC position according to the EPID images, various positions of the MLC with intentional errors in the range 0.1–1 mm were assessed. Second, to validate the geometric accuracy during DWA irradiation, tests were designed in consideration of three indices. Test 1 evaluated the accuracy of the MLC position. Test 2 assessed dose output consistency with variable dose rate (160–400 MU/min), gantry speed (2.2–6°/s), and ring speed (0.5–2.7°/s). Test 3 validated dose output consistency with variable values of the above parameters plus MLC speed (1.6–4.2 cm/s). All tests were delivered to the EPID and compared with those obtained using a stationary radiation beam with a 0° gantry angle. Irradiation log data were recorded simultaneously. The 0.1‐mm intentional error on the MLC position could be detected by the EPID, which is smaller than the EPID pixel size. In Test 1, the MLC slit widths agreed within 0.20 mm of their exposed values. The averaged root‐mean‐square error (RMSE) of the dose outputs was less than 0.8% in Test 2 and Test 3. Using log data analysis in Test 3, the RMSE between the planned and recorded data was 0.1 mm, 0.12°, and 0.07° for the MLC position, gantry angle, and ring angle, respectively. The proposed method is useful for routine QA of the accuracy of DWA.
著作権等: © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2433/231166
DOI(出版社版): 10.1002/acm2.12324
PubMed ID: 29633542
出現コレクション:学術雑誌掲載論文等

アイテムの詳細レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。