このアイテムのアクセス数: 369

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
j.proeng.2018.01.053.pdf477.8 kBAdobe PDF見る/開く
完全メタデータレコード
DCフィールド言語
dc.contributor.authorAbe, Miwaen
dc.contributor.authorOchiai, Chihoen
dc.contributor.authorOkazaki, Kenjien
dc.contributor.alternative落合, 知帆ja
dc.contributor.alternative岡﨑, 健二ja
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-18T06:12:35Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-18T06:12:35Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn1877-7058-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2433/231170-
dc.description7th International Conference on Building Resilience; Using scientific knowledge to inform policy and practice in disaster risk reduction, ICBR2017, 27 - 29 November 2017, Bangkok, Thailanden
dc.description.abstractAfter the Indian Ocean Tsunami in 2004, many organizations supported housing construction in disaster affected areas. Several documents and papers reported that adopting the community participation in the post disaster situation is effective because disaster affected people needed skills to get a job to increase their income. Many organizations adopted the participatory method in their recovery program especially in housing construction because it would increase people’s awareness to the natural disasters and develop their capacity through the working processes. This research aims to evaluate the long-term changes between level of people’s participation in post-disaster housing construction and current level of awareness for the natural disaster. Questionnaire survey was conducted in three areas which were affected by tsunami (Ache) and earthquake (Yogyakarta and Padang) in Indonesia. Ache was devastated by Indian Ocean Tsunami in 2004, about 31, 000 people were killed in the capital of Banda Ache alone. Yogyakarta was hit by earthquake in 2006, and over 5, 000 people were killed and 95% housing was collapsed in the community located near the epicenter. Padang was affected by earthquake in 2009, and 1, 100 people were reported to be killed or missing. Total of 504 samples were collected (Ache 170, Yogyakarta 155 and Padang 179), we have compared three areas to understand the relationship with ‘participation’ and ‘awareness’. This research findings will be useful to the housing reconstruction planning such as how to increase people’s awareness and how we can approach to people’s action for the future. We believe the possibility of participatory method for recovery phase, but long-term evaluation will reveal undiscussed issues, and it will give us a hint to improve more effective support for the people.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier BVen
dc.rights© 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the 7th International Conference on Building Resilience. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en
dc.subjecthousing reconstructionen
dc.subjectparticipatory approachen
dc.subjectdisaster awarenessen
dc.subjectdisaster recoveryen
dc.titleIs post-disaster housing reconstruction with participatory method effective to increasing people’s awareness for disaster prevention?en
dc.typeconference paper-
dc.type.niitypeConference Paper-
dc.identifier.jtitleProcedia Engineeringen
dc.identifier.volume212-
dc.identifier.spage411-
dc.identifier.epage418-
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.053-
dc.textversionpublisher-
dc.addressCenter for Policy Studies, Kumamoto Universityen
dc.addressKyoto University Graduate School of Global Environmental Studiesen
dc.addressKyoto University Graduate School of Global Environmental Studiesen
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
datacite.awardNumber15H05135-
jpcoar.funderName日本学術振興会ja
jpcoar.funderName.alternativeJapan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)en
出現コレクション:学術雑誌掲載論文等

アイテムの簡略レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。