ダウンロード数: 527

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
Himalayan-19-073.pdf1.62 MBAdobe PDF見る/開く
完全メタデータレコード
DCフィールド言語
dc.contributor.author真崎, 克彦ja
dc.contributor.alternativeMasaki, Katsuhikoen
dc.contributor.transcriptionマサキ, カツヒコja-Kana
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-13T08:16:57Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-13T08:16:57Z-
dc.date.issued2018-03-28-
dc.identifier.issn0914-8620-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2433/235137-
dc.description.abstractBhutan's 'democratic constitutional monarchy' resumed in 2008, with the promulgation of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Bhutan; it effected the introduction of a parliamentary system in which the members of the bicameral legislature are elected by universal suffrage, while the Cabinet is formed by the ruling party holding the majority of seats in the lower house. At the same time, Bhutan's monarch exercises oversight of the parliamentary system, to prevent it from lapsing into unrestrained interest group politics, at the expense of 'the national interest and well-being of the people' (the overarching mandate upheld in the Constitution). This positioning of the King is typically seen by critics to represent a paternalistic and oppressive polity, infringing on individuals' liberty and rights. This paper is aimed at critically re-examining this line of argumentation, with reference to Max Weber who put forth the notion of a 'parliamentary monarchy' prior to the First World War. According to Weber, in a parliamentary democracy that does not by itself bring about an associative bond in society, a monarch can play a role of facilitating political leaders to heed 'the national interest and well-being of the people'. In this way, individuals' liberty and rights of the people can be promoted better, owing to a monarch who nurture a feeling of commitment among political leaders to identify worthy national priorities. Otherwise, a parliamentary democracy remains liable, despite its promise to ensure popular responsiveness, to cause political power to overly concentrate in the hands of the few, thereby creating a gulf between the government and the people. By drawing on this proposition of Weber's, this paper is to elucidate how Bhutan's 'democratic constitutional monarchy' embodies an alternative route to individuals' liberty and rights. It thus relativizes the above-mentioned critique that argues against according renewed importance to the country's monarch.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isojpn-
dc.publisher京都大学ヒマラヤ研究会; 京都大学霊長類学・ワイルドライフサイエンス・リーディング大学院; 京都大学ヒマラヤ研究ユニットja
dc.publisher.alternativeThe Association for the Studies of Himalaya, Kyoto University ; The Leading Graduate Program for Primatology and Wildlife Science, Kyoto University ; Kyoto University Unit for Himalayan Studiesen
dc.subject.ndc225.8-
dc.title<原著・翻訳>ブータンの民主立憲君主制に対する批判の再考 --「現実の多元性」を踏まえた「意味のある価値評価」を目指して--ja
dc.title.alternative<Original Articles>Re-examining Critique of Bhutan's 'Democratic Constitutional Monarchy' --Towards A More Meaningful, Multifaceted Value Judgement--en
dc.typedepartmental bulletin paper-
dc.type.niitypeDepartmental Bulletin Paper-
dc.identifier.ncidAN10392447-
dc.identifier.jtitleヒマラヤ学誌ja
dc.identifier.volume19-
dc.identifier.spage73-
dc.identifier.epage81-
dc.textversionpublisher-
dc.sortkey12-
dc.address甲南大学マネジメント創造学部ja
dc.address.alternativeHirao School of Management, Konan Universityen
dc.identifier.selfDOI10.14989/HSM.19.73-
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
datacite.awardNumber23510326-
dc.identifier.pissn0914-8620-
dc.identifier.jtitle-alternativeHimalayan study monographsen
jpcoar.funderName日本学術振興会ja
jpcoar.funderName.alternativeJapan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)en
出現コレクション:第19号

アイテムの簡略レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。