このアイテムのアクセス数: 808

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
j.erss.2017.10.043.pdf531.41 kBAdobe PDF見る/開く
完全メタデータレコード
DCフィールド言語
dc.contributor.authorMori, Akihisaen
dc.contributor.alternative森, 晶寿ja
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-05T04:28:40Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-05T04:28:40Z-
dc.date.issued2018-01-
dc.identifier.issn2214-6296-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2433/253581-
dc.description.abstractElectricity systems are so strongly path dependent and deeply embedded in society that vertically integrated monopolistic or oligopolistic supply are justified. However, over-incentivize for capacity investment, excess dependency on fossil fuel, inefficient supply, and lack of customized services, accountability and participation raise dissatisfaction with the prevailing system, urging system transition. Given high potential of renewable energy in breaking the lock-in and generating positive feedback effects, this paper aims to explore how niche innovators and incumbents capitalize on their resources and power to create, augment or weaken prevailing political path-dependencies and lock-in of the prevailing electricity supply system to prospect a future energy transition, taking China as a case. Main findings are: (a) renewable energy has generated feedback effects in China; (b) regime actors have capitalized on their resources and power to organize alliances to be consistent with the government policy orientation while blocking institutional reforms for energy transition; and (c) their resources and power are derived from the monopolistic or oligopolistic electricity supply system and the government price control, both of which are justified for the sake of energy security and economic stabilization.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier BVen
dc.rights© 2017. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
dc.rightsThe full-text file will be made open to the public on 1 January 2020 in accordance with publisher's 'Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving'en
dc.rightsThis is not the published version. Please cite only the published version.en
dc.rightsこの論文は出版社版でありません。引用の際には出版社版をご確認ご利用ください。ja
dc.rightsA part of this PDF was redacted for privacy protection. 個人情報保護により非表示の部分があります.en
dc.subjectEnergy systemen
dc.subjectSocio-technical transitionen
dc.subjectPolitical economyen
dc.subjectChinaen
dc.titleSocio-technical and political economy perspectives in the Chinese energy transitionen
dc.typejournal article-
dc.type.niitypeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.jtitleEnergy Research & Social Scienceen
dc.identifier.volume35-
dc.identifier.spage28-
dc.identifier.epage36-
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.043-
dc.textversionauthor-
dc.addressGraduate School of Global Environmental Studies, Kyoto Universityen
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
datacite.date.available2020-01-01-
datacite.awardNumber26281061-
dc.identifier.eissn2214-6296-
jpcoar.funderName日本学術振興会ja
jpcoar.funderName.alternativeJapan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)en
出現コレクション:学術雑誌掲載論文等

アイテムの簡略レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。