ダウンロード数: 192

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
I.A.S_015_205.pdf530.35 kBAdobe PDF見る/開く
タイトル: <論考>中東政治研究におけるイスラーム主義の位相 --「方法論的セキュラリズム」を超えて--
その他のタイトル: <Articles>Islamism in the Study of Middle East Politics: Beyond ‘Methodological Secularism’
著者: 末近, 浩太  KAKEN_name
著者名の別形: SUECHIKA, Kota
発行日: 22-Mar-2022
出版者: 京都大学大学院アジア・アフリカ地域研究研究科附属イスラーム地域研究センター
誌名: イスラーム世界研究
巻: 15
開始ページ: 205
終了ページ: 221
抄録: The post Arab Spring period has witnessed the fall of Islamism, ontologically and epistemologically; i.e. the mainstream Islamist movements such as the Muslim Brotherhood and the Nahda Party failed to remain in power, and thus their academic significance seemed to decline among Middle East politics researchers. Accordingly, the discourse of the ‘end of Islamism’ became prominent in recent years. Yet, it is widely acknowledged that the politicsreligion relation is one of the most important research agendas of the study of Middle East politics and that Islamism or various ideas urged to reflect religious values and doctrine to everyday politics are still effective in the region. This paper aims to reconsider the significance of Islamism or political Islam in the study of Middle East politics. It firstly discusses the problem of the so-called ‘methodological secularism, ’ which considers the politics-religion relations as if they are settled issues, has been the premise of the study of Middle East politics, and hence Islamism has been often ‘secularwashed’ or otherwise dismissed as a deviant case or a paradox in varying ‘scientific’ analyses. This paper, then, tries to explore a new analytical framework of how Islamism can be studied in a way that it does not simply become a deviant case or a paradox particularly in the study of Middle East politics by maintaining a cautious stance addressing the reality of ‘not all but parts of politics are driven by religion’ -- rather than the traditional essentialist’s mode of “politics is driven by religion” in the Middle East. For this to be effective, this paper suggests overcoming the traditional polarization of Islamist studies: “cultural” vs. “structural”; “text” vs. “context”; “doctrine, ideology, and sociology” vs. “political process, ” and more broadly, to reconsider the common analytical gap between ‘what’ and ‘why’ questions, between the humanities and the social sciences. This paper concludes that the upgrading of Islamist studies may provide an opportunity to reconfigure academic knowledge in a way that cuts across political science and religious studies, as well as social sciences and humanities, to accurately analyze the ‘intersection’ of politics and religion in the Middle East today.
記述: 本稿は、日本国際政治学会2019年度研究大会・分科会C-3「中東:ポストIS期におけるイスラーム主義運動と中東政治」における報告ペーパー「中東政治研究におけるイスラーム主義:逸脱事例・パラドクス・選択バイアス」に加筆・修正をしたものである。
著作権等: 本文ファイルは2022-05-01に公開
©京都大学大学院アジア・アフリカ地域研究研究科附属イスラーム地域研究センター 2022
© مركز دراسات الحضارة الإسلامية بجامعة كيوتو، ٢٠٢٢
DOI: 10.14989/269334
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2433/269334
出現コレクション:Vol.15

アイテムの詳細レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このリポジトリに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。