このアイテムのアクセス数: 59

このアイテムのファイル:
ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット 
mrms.mp.2021-0065.pdf11.84 MBAdobe PDF見る/開く
タイトル: Clinical Application of MPRAGE Wave Controlled Aliasing in Parallel Imaging (Wave-CAIPI): A Comparative Study with MPRAGE GRAPPA
著者: Sakurama, Azusa
Fushimi, Yasutaka
Nakajima, Satoshi
Sakata, Akihiko
Hinoda, Takuya
Oshima, Sonoko
Otani, Sayo
Wicaksono, Krishna Pandu
Liu, Wei
Maki, Takakuni
Okada, Tomohisa
Takahashi, Ryosuke
Nakamoto, Yuji
著者名の別形: 櫻間, 梓
伏見, 育崇
中島, 諭
坂田, 昭彦
日野田, 卓也
大嶋, 園子
大谷, 紗代
眞木, 崇州
岡田, 知久
髙橋, 良輔
中本, 裕士
キーワード: voxel-based morphometry
magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo
wave-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging
generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition
subfield analysis
発行日: 2022
出版者: Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
誌名: Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences
巻: 21
号: 4
開始ページ: 633
終了ページ: 647
抄録: PURPOSE: To compare reliability and elucidate clinical application of magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (MPRAGE) with 9-fold acceleration by using wave-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging (Wave-CAIPI 3 × 3) in comparison to conventional MPRAGE accelerated by using generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition (GRAPPA) 2 × 1. METHODS: A total of 26 healthy volunteers and 33 patients were included in this study. Subjects were scanned with two MPRAGEs, GRAPPA 2 × 1 and Wave-CAIPI 3 × 3 acquired in 5 min 21 s and 1 min 42 s, respectively, on a 3T MR scanner. Healthy volunteers underwent additional two MPRAGEs (CAIPI 3 × 3 and GRAPPA 3 × 3). The image quality of the four MPRAGEs was visually evaluated with a 5-point scale in healthy volunteers, and the SNR of four MPRAGEs was also calculated by measuring the phantom 10 times with each MPRAGE. Based on the results of the visual evaluation, voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analyses, including subfield analysis, were performed only for GRAPPA 2 × 1 and Wave-CAIPI 3 × 3. Correlation of segmentation results between GRAPPA 2 × 1 and Wave-CAIPI 3 × 3 was assessed. RESULTS: In visual evaluations, scores for MPRAGE GRAPPA 2 × 1 (mean rank: 4.00) were significantly better than those for Wave-CAIPI 3 × 3 (mean rank: 3.00), CAIPI 3 × 3 (mean rank: 1.83), and GRAPPA 3 × 3 (mean rank: 1.17), and scores for Wave-CAIPI 3×3 were significantly better than those for CAIPI 3 × 3 and GRAPPA 3 × 3. Image noise was evident at the center for additional MPRAGE CAIPI 3 × 3 and GRAPPA 3 × 3. The correlation of segmentation results between GRAPPA 2 × 1 and Wave-CAIPI 3 × 3 was higher than 0.85 in all VOIs except globus pallidus. Subfield analysis of hippocampus also showed a high correlation between GRAPPA 2 × 1 and Wave-CAIPI 3 × 3. CONCLUSION: MPRAGE Wave-CAIPI 3 × 3 shows relatively better contrast, despite of its short scan time of 1 min 42 s. The volumes derived from automated segmentation of MPRAGE Wave-CAIPI are considered to be reliable measures.
著作権等: © 2021 by Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International] license.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2433/278353
DOI(出版社版): 10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0065
PubMed ID: 34602534
出現コレクション:学術雑誌掲載論文等

アイテムの詳細レコードを表示する

Export to RefWorks


出力フォーマット 


このアイテムは次のライセンスが設定されています: クリエイティブ・コモンズ・ライセンス Creative Commons